Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Volcanic Hazard at Proposed Yucca Mountain Nuclear Waste Repository
American Geophysical Union News | July 31, 2002

Posted on 08/01/2002 9:52:36 PM PDT by brat

31 July 2002
AGU Release No. 02-27

Volcanic Hazard at Proposed Yucca Mountain Nuclear Waste Repository Potentially Greater than Previously Thought, Researchers Say

WASHINGTON - A volcanic eruption might cause greater damage than previously thought to the proposed high-level nuclear waste storage facility beneath Yucca Mountain, Nevada. This, according to research presented by Andrew Woods of the BP Institute, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom, and colleagues this month in the journal, Geophysical Research Letters, published by the American Geophysical Union.

Yucca Mountain is located within a long-lived volcanic field. Risk assessments have suggested that the probability of volcanic activity occurring during the 10,000-year compliance period of the repository is around 1 in 1,000 to 1 in 10,000. However, because such activity could have a significant impact on public health and safety, Woods and his colleagues developed a physical model to understand some of the risks associated with volcanic disruption of the repository.

Eruptions from volcanoes located within 12 miles [20 kilometers] of the proposed repository have tended to produce small volumes of magma, or molten rock. However, the content of volcanic gases in the magma means that the eruptions have been quite explosive.

The model developed by Woods and others envisions that magma rising from below Yucca Mountain would form a narrow body of molten rock called a dike. The dike is hypothesized to cut through several of the repository drifts and be diverted into them. Upon entering a drift, the high gas content of the magma would cause it to expand rapidly.

Based on their models, the scientists found that magma in the drifts could reach speeds on the order of 200-600 mph [100-300 m/s], filling parts of the repository with magma within a matter of hours after the initial eruption. Flowing magma might displace canisters holding radioactive waste. Additionally, intense heat associated with the magma would be expected to cause extensive damage to the containers. The results suggest that a greater number of canisters could be affected than previously estimated. The researchers also suggest that the pressure associated with the magma could be sufficient to open new and existing fractures at Yucca Mountain, providing a conduit for material to reach the surface.

Woods and his colleagues note that although their models are simplified relative to the complex interactions that would occur in the repository during a volcanic eruption, the models are consistent with understanding of these types of eruptions. Therefore, while previous estimates suggest that the probability of a volcanic event may be very low, potentially significant impacts on the site during such an event warrants further research to fully assess the risk.

**********


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; US: Nevada
KEYWORDS: volcanos; yuccamountain
Saw this on a trailer on Fox News. I found it doing a search of American Geophysical Union.
1 posted on 08/01/2002 9:52:36 PM PDT by brat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: brat
--more highly hypothetical hogwash from the anti-nuke crowd--I'm surprised there hasn't been a "study" of the probability of an asteroid hitting Yucca Mountain--
2 posted on 08/01/2002 10:03:37 PM PDT by rellimpank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rellimpank
Only you pro-dumpers think so. The rest of us know that there are indisputable facts at our disposal.
3 posted on 08/01/2002 10:11:14 PM PDT by brat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: brat
I'm actually in favor of letting the Nevadans decide this issue for themselves (States Rights). But man, somebody is scraping the bottom of the barrel for arguments. Has somebody done a study of what will happen if an army of vampires and zombies attack the mountain? That could be bad too.
4 posted on 08/01/2002 10:11:20 PM PDT by Arkinsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arkinsaw
Check out their site....they're more than some fly by night outfit....nary a vampire study anywhere. LOL
5 posted on 08/01/2002 10:28:21 PM PDT by brat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: brat
Any kind of valid geophysical model will be based on the well-established principle of uniformitarianism. This recognizes that short-term, catastrophic changes in geologic forms can occur, but, first, they are quite rare, and, second, the events leading up to them occur over long periods of time, often measured in terms of geologic ages. During this time, certainly the radiological hazard of the materials placed there will decay significantly, and even the IHI mentioned by another poster on a past thread will decrease.

One component of the geologic studies done in the area of the Yucca Mountain site was to assess the frequency of past tectonic activity, its probability in the future, and consequences under reasonable scenarios. All of these, to date, indicate a very safe and secure site, now and in the future.

6 posted on 08/02/2002 6:10:37 AM PDT by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: brat
As a 300 MPH pyroclastic flow buries the Luxor we can all be thankful it isn't radioactive.
7 posted on 08/02/2002 6:14:57 AM PDT by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tijeras_Slim
--since I work about 300 yards from the Luxor , my mind is now at ease--
8 posted on 08/02/2002 2:54:25 PM PDT by rellimpank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Arkinsaw
Has somebody done a study of what will happen if an army of vampires and zombies attack the mountain?

Such a study has not been done yet, as far as I am aware. But it is likely that when the time comes the NIMBYs will intervene and insist that such a study be done. And perhaps some wacko judge somewhere will uphold it. After all, its in the same vein as proving a negative.

That could be bad too.

Undoubtedly so. And perhaps it has an equal or higher probability than some of the scenarios already investigated (e.g., diastrophism that somehow diverts the entire flow of the Colorado River freely flowing through the drift tunnels. Overall impact? Negligible.)

9 posted on 08/04/2002 9:27:23 AM PDT by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: chimera
The next claim the anti nukes will come up with will probably be that one of their scientists has discovered how to reincarnate Sampson and that he in a fit of rage could break open all of the containers and throw the contents into downtown Las Vegas.
10 posted on 08/04/2002 9:37:42 AM PDT by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: dalereed
The next claim the anti nukes will come up with will probably be that one of their scientists has discovered how to reincarnate Sampson and that he in a fit of rage could break open all of the containers and throw the contents into downtown Las Vegas.

Hey, prove, with 100% certainty, that it can't happen! This seems to be the jist of many of the wackos' arguments. Come up with some wildly speculative scenarios and then put the onus on the proponents to disprove them. IOW, prove a negative.

11 posted on 08/05/2002 6:03:00 AM PDT by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: chimera
Hey, prove, with 100% certainty, that it can't happen! This seems to be the jist of many of the wackos' arguments. Come up with some wildly speculative scenarios and then put the onus on the proponents to disprove them. IOW, prove a negative.

You mean like proving that certain mythologic beasts don't exist? );}
12 posted on 08/05/2002 6:07:48 AM PDT by Kozak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Kozak
Well, I promise I won't attack Yucca Mountain, "Reign of Fire" notwithstanding...:-)
13 posted on 08/05/2002 6:16:36 AM PDT by chimera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson