Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tall_Texan
Everyone should take a look at this site - there are so many things that can and should be noted. One of the most obvious to me was Peter Jenning's comment (before the towers fell) about perhaps this is a response to the "anger and yes frustration" that people are feeling (unspoken with America). I hit the ceiling when I heard that - kneejerk liberalism "it's our fault". Nobody seems to have noticed that one, he got a pass on that one.
66 posted on 10/24/2002 4:38:33 AM PDT by I still care
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]


To: I still care
As someone who has a degeree in Broadcast Journalism (Univ. of Texas, 1979), I am fascinated with multiple media coverage of the same live unscripted event. It is rare to see them cover something as dramatic and unpredictable as the Sept. 11th terrorist attacks (the assassination of JFK and the near assassinations of Ronald Reagan and Pope John Paul are the only ones I can recall where you could see them follow a story as it happened).

It is, in a sense, too bad that the archive picks Washington DC affiliates who, of course, were more inclined to cover the events at the Pentagon and the rumors swirling around Washington with local reporters than to stay with the national folks but this archive allows me to see and study much more than I ever expected to review.

While I'm still reviewing them, the one thing I find striking is how quickly Fox reporters identified this as an act of terrorism when nobody else was using "t" word for much of anything until Bush, himself, identified it as a act of terrorism.

CNN appeared to be the hardest ones to convince that it was a deliberate act, endlessly exploring ideas that pilots were just flying off course or that something might have tampered with the radar. They really looked foolish.

Then, viewing the reactions of those who saw the first tower fall. Even hardened reporters don't often get to see 100-story buildings full of people collapse on live television. Even then, some of the anchors seemed very confused about what they were watching and had to rely on folks over the phone to tell them what had happened. The more distant they were from the scene, the more puzzled they were - indicating they weren't watching closely.

At some point, I'll get around to putting a report card on this thread of highs and lows of each network's coverage as I saw it.

67 posted on 10/24/2002 8:52:55 AM PDT by Tall_Texan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson