Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Saudi FM arrives in Tehran, says kingdom opposes U.S. strike on Iraq
Al Bawaba, the Middle East Gateway ^ | Augustus 03 2002

Posted on 08/03/2002 12:54:44 PM PDT by knighthawk

Saudi Foreign Minister, Prince Saud al-Faisal arrived in Tehran Saturday for a one-day visit and was welcomed at Mehrabad International Airport by his Iranian counterpart Kamal Kharrazi.

Speaking to reporters upon arrival, al-Faisal said that his visit is aimed at examining the stances of the two Islamic states on a wide range of issues. He added he was also carrying a written message from Crown Prince Abdullah bin Abdul Aziz for Iranian President Mohammad Khatami.

"Ways of expanding the two countries' relations as well as Middle East issues, including those relating to Iraq and Palestine, will be discussed in meetings with the Iranian officials," al-Faisal was quoted as saying. "Our stance is one with Iran over the (planned) American military attack against Iraq," he conveyed.

"Our stand with Saudi Arabia is one in the sense that the Islamic Republic of Iran is opposed to any military attack on Arab and Islamic countries," Kharrazi said, according to IRNA. The Iranian foreign minister added, "Since both countries wish to seize every opportunity to expand their cooperation, ways of strengthening bilateral cooperation as well as latest international and regional developments will be examined in this trip."

Kharrazi expressed the hope that "consultations will lead to further expansion of cooperation between the two countries and leave positive effects on regional developments."

Relations between Iran and Saudi Arabia have improved since the 1997 election of Khatami, after nearly two decades of political and ideological tensions. Khatami made a historic trip to Saudi Arabia in 1999.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: alfaisal; iran; iraq; kharrazi; saudi; saudiarabia; usstrikes

1 posted on 08/03/2002 12:54:45 PM PDT by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MizSterious; rebdov; Nix 2; green lantern; BeOSUser; Brad's Gramma; dreadme; keri; Turk2; ...
Ping
2 posted on 08/03/2002 12:56:29 PM PDT by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
I don't want to sound pessimistic, but I don't think Desert Storm Round 2 would be as successful as it was a decade ago because we don't have the same coalition that we did ten years ago.
3 posted on 08/03/2002 1:01:23 PM PDT by Commander8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
"Our stance is one with Iran over the (planned) American military attack against Iraq," he conveyed.

"Our stand with Saudi Arabia is one in the sense that the Islamic Republic of Iran is opposed to any military attack on Arab and Islamic countries," Kharrazi said, according to IRNA.

Saudi Arabia provided Bin Laden, fifteen of nineteen 911 hijackers, a telethon for Palestinian terror bombers, and funding for Irani madrassahs breeding the coming genorations of terrorists.

Iran will build nuclear weapons with its Russian powerplants, with which to threaten its two main food groups, Israelis and Americans.

Saudi Arabia and Iran, partners in terror.

Want more? Don't drill ANWR.

And remember, folks: Islam is a religion of peace.

4 posted on 08/03/2002 1:11:21 PM PDT by PhilDragoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhilDragoo
Time Questions U.S. Ties With Saudi Arabia
5 posted on 08/03/2002 1:24:13 PM PDT by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: knighthawk
Just another piece of evidence: Islamic factions are setting aside their differences to present a "united front" against "the Infidel".

They deny this, of course...

6 posted on 08/03/2002 1:36:36 PM PDT by genefromjersey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: genefromjersey
and so many here forget that Dubya and Pootie Pootpenned a deal for Caspean Sea oil for 20 years...screw Saudi
7 posted on 08/03/2002 2:14:14 PM PDT by cactusSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Commander8
It will be more sucessful because we don't have the same restraining coalition we had 10 years ago. Look, Saudi Arabia opposes our involvment in Iraq only because they fear our indepedence from their oil.
8 posted on 08/06/2002 1:16:54 PM PDT by Dixie republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson