Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Church, state 'wall' not idea of Jefferson
THE WASHINGTON TIMES ^ | August 5, 2002 | Larry Witham

Posted on 08/04/2002 11:55:06 PM PDT by nickcarraway

Edited on 07/12/2004 3:56:04 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

New research on Thomas Jefferson's "wall of separation" between church and state shows that Jefferson never intended it to be the iron curtain of today, which instead was built on anti-Catholic legal views in the 1940s.

Though the new scholarship has received good reviews for exploding a "Jeffersonian myth" about a wall against religion, others say it is too late to tear down a barrier that Americans feel comfortable with.


(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: firstammendment; liberty; religion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 last
To: Richard Kimball
Speaking of revisionism: the word 'liberal' used to mean something to be proud of (pro freedom, limited government, anti-bureaucracy). I'm all for bringing it back, too.
41 posted on 12/21/2005 8:34:50 PM PST by LowCountryJoe (The Far Right and the Far Left both disdain markets. If the Left ever finds God, the GOP is toast.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

What part of "Congress shall pass no law" do they not understand?


42 posted on 12/21/2005 8:36:35 PM PST by Hoodat ( Silly Dems)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Richard Kimball
Still, there is a connection. KKK- anti Catholic. Black- KKK. Black- anti-Catholic SCOTUS decision. BINGO!
43 posted on 12/21/2005 8:49:16 PM PST by celmak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: AZRepublican

The courts aren't interested in properly interpreting the Constitution. They decide what they want to rule, then work backwards to support their argument. The "separation" ruling is blatant, but Roe V. Wade was probably the worst Supreme Court decision ever rendered, from a legal standpoint. They couldn't even decide whether it rested with the 4th amendment "privacy" clause (which also doesn't exist) or the 14th amendment "equal protection" clause.


44 posted on 12/21/2005 8:56:33 PM PST by Richard Kimball (Tenure is the enemy of excellence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson