[aristeides]

This article contains a number of demonstrably untrue statements, like:

Dr Hatfill also has access to anthrax

, and that anthrax is his area of expertise.

If Australia's libel laws are at all like the UK's (and I believe they are,) Hatfill now has a pretty clear cause of action against this paper. Since this reporter was apparently one of those getting FBI leaks, I think he also has more reason now to complain about what the FBI is doing.

[Fred Mertz]

But how could a "person of interest" in the anthrax case get a job funded by the Justice Department to teach FBI agents about anthrax?

I didn't connect these dots earlier, but they sure cause one to think deeply. I thought he was connected to LSU as a government contractor, whose company name escapes me. I didn't realize the funds were funneled from DoJ.