Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Wonder if GA's SINdy McKinney will pull the same trick when she loses...?
1 posted on 08/16/2002 6:32:14 AM PDT by meandog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: mhking
Thoughts?
2 posted on 08/16/2002 6:33:12 AM PDT by meandog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: meandog
LaTosha Brown / Yusuf Salaam

my, what a choice the folks in that district have, ehh ??

fercrisesake ...

3 posted on 08/16/2002 6:34:27 AM PDT by tomkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: rdb3; Khepera; elwoodp; MAKnight; condolinda; mafree; Trueblackman; FRlurker; Teacher317; ...
Black conservative ping

If you want on (or off) of my black conservative ping list, please let me know via FREEPmail. (And no, you don't have to be black to be on the list!)

Extra warning: this is a high-volume ping list.

4 posted on 08/16/2002 6:35:06 AM PDT by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: meandog
Does the secret ballot not apply to primaries, or don't they have that in Alabama?
5 posted on 08/16/2002 6:37:53 AM PDT by Dakmar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: meandog
The couple of things that stick out to me are:

Why the hell does the GOP allow crossover voting if the Dem's don't? How stupid.

It scares me to death that a political party has the authority to basically act as judge, jury, and executioner in this matter. Frightning.
6 posted on 08/16/2002 6:44:26 AM PDT by mikesmad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: meandog
What? An african PO'd withn another african? There is just NO justice here.
7 posted on 08/16/2002 6:54:08 AM PDT by sandydipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: meandog
...white voters who have been forced to testify before a legal panel of Democratic Party officials.

So which was it? A LEGAL panel or a DEMOCRAT PARTY panel?

The two are mutually exclusive. The Democrat Party has no legal authority to decide who votes in its primary. If they have a problem with it, let 'em take it to the Alabama courts.

If I were a voter asked to appear before this kangaroo court, I'd simply refuse.

11 posted on 08/16/2002 6:58:47 AM PDT by Illbay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: meandog
Republican voters prefer his moderate views to what they consider Brown's "racially divisive" rhetoric.

But Brown claims the election was unfair.

"I certainly feel that there is an effort led in the white community to sabotage the campaign," she said.

I wonder where her constituents get the idea she is "racially divisive" and want to get rid of her? Baffling.

24 posted on 08/16/2002 8:16:13 AM PDT by What Is Ain't
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: meandog
If I was in this situation and got called to testify, I would simply say I voted for Brown, and because I mistakenly thought I could vote in that election, please take my vote off of Brown's total. :-)
25 posted on 08/16/2002 8:17:24 AM PDT by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: meandog; All
Brown, who is African-American, held on to her base of liberal, black voters.

Can anyone explain the reason for Fox's inconsistent treatment? If I'm writing/editing the story, the only way I'm doing that is if she's on record as calling herself A-A (if even then).

26 posted on 08/16/2002 8:17:39 AM PDT by newgeezer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: meandog
I would have to say, yes.. I do see racism in this situation, and I recommend that Latosha Brown stop trying to use her same old worn out divisive racist tactics to steal this election.
29 posted on 08/16/2002 8:50:55 AM PDT by Richard Axtell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: meandog
"Many voters have admitted to crossing parties during the runoff, but insist they had no idea it was illegal.
...
Brown and her attorneys say ignorance of the law is no excuse."

Brown and her attorneys need to learn the LAW themselves.

Crossover voting is against Democratic Party rules, not Alabama law. Violating an organization's rules is VASTLY different than violating a law.

Voter intimidation and the demand for knowing how someone voted on a secret ballot, however, could easily be against the law.

Not that there is a reporter in America smart enough and gutsy enough to point that out, however...

38 posted on 08/16/2002 10:40:40 AM PDT by Southack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: meandog
Brown, who is African-American, held on to her base of liberal, black voters. But Salaam, who is both black and Muslim, attracted a large number of moderate to conservative white voters in the runoff.

I don't get it. Is Salaam African-American too? Or Arabian-American? Or just American?

Whiney liberals...a pox on them.

40 posted on 08/16/2002 11:11:53 AM PDT by hattend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: meandog
The Rats are so intolerant of a moderate Rat winning their own party's primary that they have to corall and round up and subject voters to the Inquisition to determine why the liberal lost? Pinch me I must dreaming. This doesn't sound like America. More evidence if one needed it, that liberals consider Republicans something to put away in jail or to be scraped off their shoes.
42 posted on 08/16/2002 12:19:24 PM PDT by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: meandog
Why can't I change parties any time I want to ?
Can't I be a Republican on June 10th, then decide I want to be a Democrat and 'lo & behold, there is a Rat runoff on June 26th ?
I'm SCHOCKED, SHOCKED that a case such as this could be considered illegal shennanigans !!
43 posted on 08/16/2002 2:32:12 PM PDT by stylin19a
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson