[Howlin]

The problem with that, IMO, is that there is NOBODY who you all would consider good enough to make the call.

Suppose Ted Olsen says, "I looked at the pictures, consulted with experts, and there is nothing there."

He will be the next one on "the list" of people accused of covering up for the Clintons.

There is just nobody that would satisfy the "he was murdered" crowd. Everybody is suspect.

[Burkeman1]

I think to say he was murdered is very premature and reckless. But equally dubious is anyone who agrees with the laughable findings of the Star report concerning Foster's death. At the very least existing evidence sugests the body was moved- a crime in itself.

[Samizdat]

There is just nobody that would satisfy the "he was murdered" crowd. Everybody is suspect.

I think they photos need to be viewed by the people who want to view them. And they won't be all over the internet. They can only be viewed in DC where they are. So anyone who wants to travel there should be able to view them.

As soon as somebody explains to me how fingerprints can melt off a gun because of the heat while one unidentified fingerprint remains to my satisfaction, then I will be quiet. Until then, we need to see the photos.

[Ditter]

If the picture was produced showing a bullet hole in the neck & one in the mouth who could argue with the "it was murder crowd"? Nobody.

[aristeides]

There is just nobody that would satisfy the "he was murdered" crowd. Everybody is suspect.

And that's a reason to release the evidence, so that people can make up their own minds.