Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nimc
Not enough evidence. If it is guilty, it's because he didn't testify. But I predict: not guilty.
10 posted on 08/21/2002 10:10:29 AM PDT by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: AppyPappy
My prediction is not guilty as well, AP.
12 posted on 08/21/2002 10:11:08 AM PDT by homeschool mama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: AppyPappy
I predict if guilty, it is due to the blood, hair and fibers.
13 posted on 08/21/2002 10:11:52 AM PDT by NautiNurse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: AppyPappy
Not because of the evidence but i cannot see 12 people agreeing on a not guilty verdict. My bet its guilty.
17 posted on 08/21/2002 10:13:10 AM PDT by cynicalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: AppyPappy
Unless you are on the jury panel there really is no way to know what the outcome will be...
20 posted on 08/21/2002 10:14:32 AM PDT by marajade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: AppyPappy
Not enough evidence? Did you listen to any testimony?
135 posted on 08/21/2002 10:51:17 AM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: AppyPappy
But I predict: not guilty.

Too bad Westerfield wasn't freed so he could spend the rest of his life hunting down the real murderer, perhaps enlisting OJ's help.

550 posted on 08/21/2002 12:49:25 PM PDT by My2Cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson