Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Aric2000
I believe that these games were rigged in the fashion that "what would Saddam do" and he didn't like it!!

Which is why they should let him have a free hand to do what he would. Giving the commander a script can lead to the underestimation of your future enemy's ability.

8 posted on 08/22/2002 12:42:09 PM PDT by Centurion2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Centurion2000
I disagree. You want a simulation of the enemy at hand, not a copy of your own force. It sounds like Riper wanted to fight like a typical Western commander, not like an Iraqi or Persian commander. A non-Western opponent would be less likely to probe, for example. (Less chance of getting into trouble with your superiors that way!) Thus, they would be more difficult to locate. They would be more likely to break and run. In such a circumstance, a Western force could get over extended in the chase. The non-Western force could then isolate and destroy over-reaching units. You want to simulate these kinds of defensive behaviors in a war game, not aggressive, Western behavior.
10 posted on 08/22/2002 12:55:20 PM PDT by Redcloak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson