Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cole Skipper's Promotion Held Up In Senate
Norfolk Virginian-Pilot ^ | August 28, 2002 | Dale Eisman

Posted on 08/28/2002 6:09:17 AM PDT by robowombat

Norfolk Virginian-Pilot August 28, 2002

Cole Skipper's Promotion Held Up In Senate

By Dale Eisman, The Virginian-Pilot

WASHINGTON -- A Senate committee has quietly informed the Navy that it will need extra time to review a recommendation that Cmdr. Kirk S. Lippold, skipper of the destroyer Cole when terrorists blew a hole in the side of the ship in October 2000, be promoted to captain.

The review, instigated in part at the urging of Sen. John W. Warner, R-Va., continues a running debate in and out of the service over whether Lippold bears a share of responsibility for the deaths of 17 sailors in the attack.

Lippold, now assigned to the Pentagon's Joint Staff, could not be reached Tuesday for comment on the delay of his promotion. He has met privately with the families of the dead sailors to discuss the attack and its aftermath but has not granted any interviews.

A small boat, mistaken for a garbage hauler by members of Lippold's crew, exploded alongside the Cole on Oct. 12, 2000, as the destroyer was being refueled in the harbor at Aden, Yemen. The blast caused more than $200 million in damages, along with the deaths.

The Navy's top leadership decided early last year not to punish Lippold, despite an investigator's finding that he failed to take more than 30 security steps specified for ships under ``threat condition Bravo,'' the level in force when the Cole pulled into Aden.

Adm. Vern Clark, the chief of naval operations, declared then that none of those steps would have prevented the attack. He also said that Lippold had acted reasonably, given the information available to him on the possibility of an attack.

While legally exonerating Lippold, Clark placed in his service record a copy of the Navy's formal investigation of the bombing. The more than 1,000-page document included Clark's own finding that Lippold ``should have been more pro-active'' in clarifying uncertainties about the situation in Aden before the Cole's arrival.

Its review of Lippold's promotion is the second time the Armed Services Committee has questioned the Navy's handling of the Cole investigation. As committee chairman in May 2001, Warner convened a hearing to examine whether the service had relaxed its standards for holding skippers accountable for what happens aboard their ships.

``Seventeen sailors lost their lives, families are left to bear the grief, a heavily damaged ship is being repaired at high cost to the American taxpayer,'' Warner said then. ``Though many shortfalls in the performance of those aboard Cole were identified . . . not a single disciplinary action of any kind was taken. Is the net effect of these actions . . . to hold no one accountable?''

``We have held all the parties accountable,'' Clark countered. ``There are some who believe, because they were not punished, they were not held accountable. I do not agree with that.'' The committee's review of Lippold's nomination also is holding up, at least temporarily, the promotion to captain of nearly 250 other commanders.

President Bush sent the annual nominations to Capitol Hill on June 26, several months later than usual. Promotion boards met in February to review the records of commanders eligible for promotion, but the list of those to be nominated was not forwarded to the White House until June 12.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: aden; terrorism; usnavy; usscole

1 posted on 08/28/2002 6:09:17 AM PDT by robowombat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: robowombat
This isn't that unexpected. You really can't expect to have several of your crew killed in peacetime, and not see any repurcussions.
2 posted on 08/28/2002 6:13:55 AM PDT by Illbay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Illbay
The bigger question is, why was the Cole being refueled in a dangerous place when a much safer locale was a day or two away ?
3 posted on 08/28/2002 6:39:59 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
POLITICS, and politics only!
4 posted on 08/28/2002 6:47:07 AM PDT by B4Ranch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
The fact that 23 ships had refueled in Aden without incident prior to the attack on the Cole is one reason why it was there. The real question is why did the ability to refuel at sea deteriorate to the point that any port in Southwest Asia had to be chosen.

If the Senate could justify their illegitimate behavior in not promoting Stumpf for showing up in Las Vegas in 1991 then they can legitimately justify not promoting Lippold for his negligence.

5 posted on 08/28/2002 7:08:44 AM PDT by SMEDLEYBUTLER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: robowombat
F!@#$%G Congress! These draft-dodgers and US-haters have the balls to stand in judgment of an officer who, through heroic personal action and superb command talent, saved his ship after Clinton's policies of leaving US ships defenseless overseas nearly lost Cole.

If there is one single reason to throw-out every Dem in Congress, this is it.


6 posted on 08/28/2002 8:05:09 AM PDT by pabianice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SMEDLEYBUTLER
I had read that the Cole didn't really need bunkers. It was more of a "show the flag" visit to Yemen.
7 posted on 08/28/2002 9:28:32 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: pabianice
If there is one single reason to throw-out every Dem in Congress, this is it.

FWIW, John Warner is neither a draft dodger nor a Democrat. He is, however, a major RINO...

8 posted on 08/28/2002 1:52:23 PM PDT by Corin Stormhands
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: robowombat
The persons that should be disciplined are those that ordered the ship to dock in Aden in the first place.
9 posted on 08/28/2002 1:57:11 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robowombat
The buck stops at the Captains desk. Promotion with 17 deaths is a travesty. Take his pension and leave gracefully.
10 posted on 08/28/2002 2:03:26 PM PDT by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
How about punishing the President who didn't go after Bin Laden?
11 posted on 08/28/2002 2:03:48 PM PDT by Moonman62
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: cynicom
It's unfortunate, but it's the way it should be. Either way, the skipper loses. However, the policies in place at the time should be reviewed to see whose head farther up the chain should also roll.
12 posted on 08/28/2002 2:09:48 PM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Right...Yes it is unfortunate..In an incident such as this, everyone is a loser. People at the top will never admit to errors so they must hang the collar on someone else. The Captain must walk the plank, guilty or not. Seventeen people lost their lives, he can be thankful his was not one. Take his pension and fade away.
13 posted on 08/28/2002 2:14:00 PM PDT by cynicom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SMEDLEYBUTLER
"The real question is why did the ability to refuel at sea deteriorate to the point that any port in Southwest Asia had to be chosen."

Re-fuelling at sea wasn't an option.

For political-diplomatic reasons (and for political-diplomatic reasons alone), the DOD negotiated a re-fuelling contract with the port of Aden.

It was part of a foreign aid/welfare gesture by the Clinton administration to Yemen. It was supposed to make them "friends"...

14 posted on 08/28/2002 2:16:08 PM PDT by okie01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson