Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xsysmgr
The author of this article is both right and wrong.

No one, including us, can do everything at once. If we tried to define all objectives at once, we could find it impossible (or much more difficult) to accomplish ANY of them.

The first step, toppling Saddam, is clear. Once we do, the next steps will be easier to define, and much easier to accomplish.

For instance, Iraq will make a great staging area for operations against Iran, Syria, and/or Saudi Arabia. The strategic situation will have changed dramatically in our favor. All kinds of good things might happen...
5 posted on 09/04/2002 8:19:50 AM PDT by EternalHope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: EternalHope
If President Bush has his way... then this great object lesson for other states will cause them to dismantle their own terrorist organizations. If it does not, then Iran, Syria, Sudan, Palestinian Authority, and Saudi Arabia will know that America will not falter, will not tire, and will not fail in this war.

The terrorists will have no place to go, no place to run, no place to set up shop, have no one to provide political cover.

Our list is prioritized. And as the world sees that we are true to our mission, then more will join us. Terrorism must be eradicated from the face of the earth... and then the world must be vigilant to make sure it is not resurrected.

Since the militant side of Islam and Pan-Arabism will not die... our vigilance must be even more so. It would be a shame if we only fought 1/2 way and suddenly got satisfied. That means we will be refighting the war in another 5 or 6 wars. The stakes go up because the means of terrorist executing their terror goes up.

As for me... I never want to see another building collapse. Let's fight it now. Later may prove too late.

9 posted on 09/04/2002 8:58:00 AM PDT by carton253
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: EternalHope
There are four such regimes: in Iran, Iraq, Syria and Saudi Arabia.

You are of course right in your comments. Bush has been ne using a divide and conquer approach to the middle east ever since 9/11. Such a strategy has the greatest chance of success.

Unite our enemies so lots of us can die fighting them is not too bright... unless the suggester gets to watch while others fight and die. Covering fighting and dying is a good career move. Divide them and then overthrow them one at a time is a good political move for a leader... and that is the Bush policy. We have in effect subverted Pakistan and Afghanistan. That is 2 of the 10 Muslim nations. If we can do Iraq we will have made a major dent in problems we created.

We need to remember that both England and France wanted to retain the middle east as colonies after WWII. I submit the world would be a safer place if they had. It was the combined idealism of Truman and Eisenhower that allowed the rise of these rogue states. They had visions of middle eastern Deomocracy and other silly ideas. It was Jimmy Carter who helped in the resurection of Muslim exrtremists in Iran. That silly Jimmy carter act so applauded by our media, in many ways started us down this tragic and costly path we find ourselves on. We have a history of idealistically shooting ourselves in the foot.

But we can't undo the past. It seems to me the solution that works best is divide and conquer. Anyone who studied the rise of the Soviet Union will understand how client nations can be won by force that was expended to subdue othernations. Do it two or three times and rogue nations get the message.

Dictators don't like to be ex dictators. If get right with the USA or be an ex dictator is the choice, get right with the USA will win the day.

We need to take down one of the 4 bad nations. Then take down the second. That can likely effect the desired changes in the 3 and 4th nations without much effort on our part.

A sad fact that complecates the matter is the USA will not drill for its own oil. And if we took on all the Arabs and they cut off the oil, we would have to propel our fighter aircraft with rubber bands and row our supply ships to the middle east.

The only path that makes sense is divide and conquer. No one could truly believe that we could win a frontal attack war without middle eastern oil. Those who think we can are just not thinking.

As I used to tell my staff. Journalists don't get paid to think. They get paid to create thought provoking discussions and to elect Democrats.


25 posted on 09/04/2002 5:16:29 PM PDT by Common Tator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson