Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: The Great Satan
The call to Binalshibh was on Aug. 29, so I guess the date 9/11 had been settled before the J-LO letter was delivered, even if that was on 9/4. So I wonder why bin Laden said on the videotape he didn't learn the date of 9/11 until the preceding Thursday.
90 posted on 09/10/2002 7:24:04 PM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]


To: aristeides
He might not have been running all the details. But when informed, he no doubt cell-phoned "go" to the suicide "television crew" stalking Shah Massood.
92 posted on 09/10/2002 7:36:27 PM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

To: aristeides; denydenydeny; Nogbad; keri
The call to Binalshibh was on Aug. 29, so I guess the date 9/11 had been settled before the J-LO letter was delivered, even if that was on 9/4. So I wonder why bin Laden said on the videotape he didn't learn the date of 9/11 until the preceding Thursday.

What evidence is there that the description of events on this tape is real?

I think all the information on this tape (names of hijackers, their places of birth, etc.) was pieced together from FBI reports and from what has appeared in the media. Is there anything new, or is there any respect in which the facts as given differ from those which we have been believing? (For instance, the FBI could have gotten a place of birth wrong. Or al-Qaeda could have gotten one wrong. In any case, there would have been some differences, if they weren't relying on the FBI and the Western media as their source.)

There is strong evidence that there were other hijackings planned for 9/11 which were thwarted due to the grounding of all aviation. This isn't mentioned on the tape -- in fact the very opposite is implied (with bin Laden holding up a finger for each hijacking, only going up to four). There is strong evidence that many of the hijackers were traveling on false identities; the false identities were used on the tape, even though the individuals involved are dead and need no further protection.

Moreover, I think that the individuals who are listed without a place of birth are the same ones as those for whom no place of birth is listed in the media accounts after 9/11. I haven't gone through the names in detail, so there might be some exceptions here, but a casual perusal does indicate this.

In short, I think this description of bin Laden and his cohorts on 9/11 is probably pure propaganda. And there's no great surprise in that.

98 posted on 09/10/2002 10:10:58 PM PDT by Mitchell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson