[pgkdan]

They have stated unequivocally that time is not on our side, that if they held congressional voting cards (a question put to them by a Republican congressman from VA) that they would vote to invade, that Scott Ritter is a liar (quote - "if he isn't lying now, he was certainly lying years ago"), referencing his past statements before Congress.

Who are the former inspectors? Is Richard Boucher one of them, and did they really say that Ritter is a liar? I hope someone hands that backstabbing, treacherous a-hole his head one day soon. This latest stunt of his...speaking in Iraq...borders on treason. I put him right up there with Hanoi Jane.

[Orangedog]

I think Ritter would definately fall under the "giving aid and comfort to the enemy" part of the law. Too bad no one at "Justice" has the stones to indict him.

[agrace]

Kay and Spretzel. Kay is a former chief inspector, 91-93. I don't know anymore about them than what C-Span is posting. And yes, they DID call Ritter a liar. One of the congressmen (forget which one) asked them if they would care to address what Ritter has been saying and Kay said "Well, CARE isn't the word I would use" (showing obvious disgust for what Ritter's been saying) and he proceeded to say that if Ritter isn't lying now, he was lying years ago, and all they have to do was look at the statements he made before Congress then, statements that do NOT conflict with what they were saying now, today. He ended with "You make the decision" (about Ritter's truthfulness) and the other inspector concurred.

[agrace]

Talking about Scott Ritter again re what he has said to CNN about Saddam not having nuclear weapons program. They're contradicting his statements on CNN now regarding components needed and levels of such they knew he had acquired 4 years ago.