Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Tear Falls, But President Holds Tightly to His Image (gag alert)
The New York Times ^ | 9/11/2002 | Caryn James

Posted on 09/11/2002 10:31:50 AM PDT by Utah Girl

When Scott Pelley asks President Bush about his first visit to ground zero, three days after the attacks, he begins, "You had been briefed on ground zero," and even before he finishes the question, Mr. Bush is shaking his head.

"You couldn't brief anybody on ground zero," Mr. Bush says. "It was ghostly. It was like you were having a bad dream and you were walking through the dream." Speaking slowly, he is clearly haunted by those memories, and he seems moved and engaged. It's one of only two moments shown in this much-hyped exclusive interview when he does.

Mr. Pelley had two interviews with the president, the first a couple of weeks ago on Air Force One and another last week in the Oval Office. The president granted the interviews after he turned down similar requests from other news organizations, including The New York Times. The hourlong program shaped around them (to be shown on "60 Minutes II" tonight on CBS, just before the president is scheduled to speak live) is a typical magazine report chronicling the president's experience on Sept. 11 and in the days after, padded with interviews with others in the administration. Despite the president's sound bites, the report is similar to half a dozen others.

Substantively, the program is frustrating because the president and his aides stay relentlessly on message, that message being that Mr. Bush resolved to seek justice in the first minutes after learning of the attacks, even as he was reading to second-graders in a Florida classroom.

"What was going through your mind?" Mr. Pelley asks about that moment.

Mr. Bush says: "That we're at war. And that somebody had dared attack us, and we're going to do something about it."

With that unwavering message echoing through the hour, it's the sidelights that become fascinating: details of what happened behind the scenes that day; the colloquial language that is so calculated a part of the Bush image; the scene of the president weeping as Mr. Pelley interviews him on Air Force One, offering a glimpse behind the presidential persona that may be more revealing than he intended.

As the report reconstructs Sept. 11, weaving all the interviews together, it creates a visceral sense of how frantically the government was scrambling for information, both on Air Force One and in the White House bunker, where the vice president and others had been taken. Air-traffic controllers feared that as many as 11 planes might have been hijacked, and the president ordered military jets to shoot down hijacked planes if they had to. Condoleezza Rice, the national security adviser, was in the bunker, and she recalls that when the flight crashed in Pennsylvania, its passengers apparently attempting to take it back from the hijackers, "there was that horrible time when we wondered if Flight 93 had indeed been shot down by an American pilot."

Much of the reconstruction of what happened on Air Force One that day comes second-hand. The Secret Service decided it was too risky for the plane to return to Washington, to Mr. Bush's frustration. Mr. Pelley says, "At one point he was overheard saying, `The American people want to know where their dang president is.' " He doesn't say who overheard it.

But Ari Fleischer, the White House press secretary, happily becomes the source for two other colorful quotations. The president ordered Mr. Fleischer to take notes, so there would be a historical record. Mr. Pelley says that according to those notes, Mr. Bush told the vice president on the phone: "We're at war, Dick. We're going to find out who did this and" (less politely) kick their behinds.

When Mr. Bush decided to fly back to the White House late that afternoon, the language Mr. Fleischer quotes is so cartoonish that Mr. Pelley asks, "Come on, he really said, `I don't want a tin-horn terrorist to keep me out of Washington?' "

Mr. Fleischer insists, "That's verbatim."

With so much language from the Old West, it's not surprising that some people worried Mr. Bush would shoot first and ask questions later. Mr. Pelley points out that some in the Pentagon were concerned that the president might immediately launch missiles toward Osama bin Laden, a tactic that had failed before. Mr. Bush seems amused and says offhandedly, "There's a lot of Nervous Nellies at the Pentagon anyway, a lot of people like to chatter."

His real message is that he's in charge. He says, "I knew exactly what had to be done, Scott, and that was to set a strategy to seek justice, find out who did it, hunt 'em down and bring them to justice."

The only time Mr. Pelley penetrates beyond that message is during one intense sequence on Air Force One. As they face each other, the president is hunched forward, and the close-up makes the lines is his face more visible than in the usual distant views. He recalls visiting relatives of those lost in the Word Trade Center, in those first days when the families still had hope. The president recalls that over and over they told him that their missing spouses or parents or children were tough and would find a way out of the rubble. "I had been briefed on the reality," Mr. Bush says. "I remember thinking the whole time that this is incredibly sad, because the loved ones won't come out."

Mr. Pelley then wonders if the president remembers a boy who asked him to sign a photograph of his father, a firefighter. Mr. Bush does: "I said, `Your Daddy won't believe that I was here, so you show him that autograph.' Just trying to provide a little hope."

And though the president looks straight into the camera with a gaze of utter control, he flicks a tear away from the side of his nose. The sight of a president crying is unusual and powerful enough to obscure his words. Didn't he just say he knew there was no hope? Mr. Bush and Mr. Pelley seem oblivious to the way he had given false hope to a child, a gesture that may have been understandable at the time but that is a weird thing to brag about later, wildly lacking self-awareness.

Near the end of the hour, when Mr. Pelley asks about urgent policy issues, the president's demeanor becomes stiff, even defensive. "After a year we still don't have Osama bin Laden," Mr. Pelley says, and Mr. Bush snaps at him, "How do you know that?" before backing off to say we don't know if he's dead or alive. About plans for attacking Iraq and resistance to those plans, the president reiterates, "The policy of the government is regime change." He seems determined not to make news in this interview.

As we see Mr. Pelley walking with Mr. Bush in the White House, his narration says, "The president told us that his job now is to keep reminding Americans that the nation is still at war." Despite its unexpected glimpses of emotion, this interview is a masterly example of that White House plan in action, as it insistently projects the image of a president going to war for justice.

60 MINUTES II

CBS, tonight at 8, Eastern and Pacific times; 7 Central time.

Jeff Fager, executive producer; Bill Owens, David Schneider and Paul Gallagher, producers; Scott Pelley, correspondent.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

1 posted on 09/11/2002 10:31:50 AM PDT by Utah Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Utah Girl
His real message is that he's in charge.

Thank God!

2 posted on 09/11/2002 10:35:05 AM PDT by still lurking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: still lurking
Exactly. I watched the re-broadcast this morning of when President Bush received the news a year ago that the Twin Towers had been hit. And just a few minutes later, you heard the resolve in his voice, on his face, and in his words that we would get those who had perpetrated this terrorism upon this nation. And his resolve is still there, a year later. It is the stupid media who have an attention span of a gnat.
3 posted on 09/11/2002 10:37:41 AM PDT by Utah Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Utah Girl
It is the stupid media who have an attention span of a gnat.

You've done it now Utah Girl, you've just insulted all the gnats in the world by comparing them to media types.

4 posted on 09/11/2002 10:39:40 AM PDT by ladtx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Utah Girl
The president granted the interviews after he turned down similar requests from other news organizations, including The New York Times

Sour grapes!

5 posted on 09/11/2002 10:45:22 AM PDT by ReaganRevolution
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Utah Girl
I watched ABC (blekk) this morning run a montage of the "Where's the President? We need comfort!"

Peter Jennings sheepishly said some people thought his remarks were critical of the President. He said no, that, He was asking the questions because he didn't have all the story.

They then ran a piece on what went on, during the time the President spent trying to get back to Washington.

I think he wants to revise his own history. He should be ashamed.

But, alas I'm whistling in the wind.
6 posted on 09/11/2002 10:45:43 AM PDT by still lurking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Utah Girl
Oh yeah, the President is so cruel in trying to give a little hope to a little boy.....What was he thinking, he should have told the lad..*kid, your dad is dead*....(sarcasm, for those not sure)
7 posted on 09/11/2002 10:46:51 AM PDT by mystery-ak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Utah Girl
The sight of a president crying is unusual and powerful enough to obscure his words

I don't recall x42's crocodile tears at Ron Brown's funeral being unusual and powerful. They were disgusting. Of course, that's because - unlike Bush's - they were phoney.

8 posted on 09/11/2002 10:53:40 AM PDT by mountaineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mystery-ak
The NYT is so patently anti-administration that one wonders when it will end the pretence and put "a DNC publication" in its masthead.
9 posted on 09/11/2002 10:55:36 AM PDT by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Utah Girl
Nothing the media can do about our love for this great President and the honorable people he chose to be in his administration. With few exceptions they have all made a great sacrifice to serve their country again.

Thank you, Mr. President.

10 posted on 09/11/2002 10:58:24 AM PDT by OldFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Utah Girl
At least his emotions are genuine, and he's not biting his lip!
11 posted on 09/11/2002 10:58:45 AM PDT by Destructor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Utah Girl
The president granted the interviews after he turned down similar requests from other news organizations, including The New York Times.

Well, gee...I wonder why he refused an interview with the NYT? What a bunch of whiners these NYTers are. Their disdain is so bloody transparent it is almost sickening to read this. The NYT is garbage.

12 posted on 09/11/2002 11:01:31 AM PDT by Wphile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Destructor
Can you imagine what clinton's lower lip would look like today, if he'd still been POTUS at the time of the attacks? Barf!
13 posted on 09/11/2002 11:01:56 AM PDT by The Great Satan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Utah Girl
Aaaaargh!

I do not want any more Diania-ized memorial services, grief counselors, navel-gazing media stories, candles, posters, lesson plans, concerts, religious services or heart-rending stories.

If the families and close friends of those who died on 9/11 want to grieve, God bless them. They can and should do so.

Me, I only want one thing today.

I want the 82nd Airborne to go over there and "get some".

14 posted on 09/11/2002 11:05:25 AM PDT by Viet Vet in Augusta GA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: still lurking
I have been lurking around all the cable and network coverage and Jennings has been doing a hit piece on our President for the past hour. How the world hates us, how stupid Bush is for wanting to attack Iraq, etc. It is sickening. And on NBC, Brokaw is interviewing a crowd full of arrogant, Bush administration haters. They want more money, more money, more money. And they think President Bush didn't protect them, insinuating he knew. I am just pissed off at some of this coverage on the one-year anniversary.
15 posted on 09/11/2002 11:07:36 AM PDT by Wait4Truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Wait4Truth
NOW NOW....you should know better than to hang around THOSE types ...... abccbsnbcpbs et al......they are just the ruling PARTY who know better than YOU DO! (sarcasm/)
16 posted on 09/11/2002 11:11:33 AM PDT by goodnesswins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Viet Vet in Augusta GA
After my husband and I said a prayer this morrning...he asked me what I was thinking....all I could say was "KILL THE B*STARDS!"
17 posted on 09/11/2002 11:12:40 AM PDT by goodnesswins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Utah Girl
American Media - THE ENEMY WITHIN
18 posted on 09/11/2002 11:13:34 AM PDT by Enduring Freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wait4Truth
I think the media has totally lost it. Their outright antagonism toward this administration is showing in spades. But you know what? It isn't affecting public opinion. Rush just said that the latest ABC/NYT poll shows W's approval rating at 71%. Ha ha ha.

God, I hate the press.

I can only imagine what it would be like if the media actually supported a Republican President! It's a wonder republicans ever get elected, what with the media's constant haranguing. Guess the American people know who to trust and it's not the media. No wonder journalists and reporters rank at the bottom of the totem pole when it comes to respect and integrity.

19 posted on 09/11/2002 11:14:36 AM PDT by Wphile
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Utah Girl
Just re-read the article. Here's my amendment.

American Media - THE ENEMY WITHIN

The New York Times are MOTHER-F#CKING WHORES

If I ever see a copy, I will tear it from your hands and burn it, right before your eyes.

20 posted on 09/11/2002 11:17:05 AM PDT by Enduring Freedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson