To: BrianS.Wise; aristeides; SLB; thinden
If not, his [Ritter] true motivations should be known. There is no time for him to speak out like the present; dissent can be tolerated, pandering to the enemy cannot. Ritter continues to puzzle me especially since he was a US Marine. I was hoping you'd come to a clear conclusion in your well written essay, but you left me hanging.
To: BrianS.Wise
I was sitting around thinking about this guy and I am considering the possibility that he is some sort of Trojan horse or some sort of foil planted in Iraq for the US to distance itself from and ultimately disprove.
I had ingested a couple of Ketel One's and cranberry at that time...but he is a wierd cat.
3 posted on
09/11/2002 6:43:49 PM PDT by
Benrand
To: BrianS.Wise; JohnHuang2; Pokey78; MeeknMing; dennisw; shaggy eel; Byron_the_Aussie
<< ... Ritter ... outrage: ..... dissent can be tolerated, pandering to the enemy cannot. >>
What's it to be Mr Ritter?
Inside your payscale or outside? [The pale]
You have precisely fifteen minutes from ........ NOW!
Bump Ping Ping Ping Ping Ping Ping
To: BrianS.Wise
Scott who???
To: BrianS.Wise
Scott Ritter is not irrelevant.
He is a traitor.
He deserves the full penalty of his crimes.
To: BrianS.Wise
My guess is blackmail.
To: BrianS.Wise
I understand that Ritter received $400K from Iraq to make a movie about the weapons inspections.
This might explain it, if true.
17 posted on
09/11/2002 7:27:10 PM PDT by
expatpat
To: BrianS.Wise
So the choices are: he's a traitor on Saddam's payroll or he has an inferiority complex and a desire for the spotlight. Do you have evidence for either of those theories?
22 posted on
09/11/2002 7:32:47 PM PDT by
palmer
To: BrianS.Wise
This is great. "Brockian" is now an adjective.
To: BrianS.Wise
The one essential element missing from this otherwise interesting analysis is that Scott Ritter, a low paid former civil servant, is $400,000 better off than he was four years ago.
Think that might have anything to do with it?
38 posted on
09/11/2002 8:59:37 PM PDT by
Wil H
To: BrianS.Wise
Soldiers like Scott Ritter and Timothy McVeigh are nothing new in history. The preening, self-regarding hero comes home and finds himself a nobody, and turns on his old comrades in arms. That's the story of Ajax. It's as old as Homer.
To: BrianS.Wise
Like Scotty boys boss from those days has said:
"He's either lying to us now or he was lying to us then".
To: BrianS.Wise
Scott has lost it, he's a ............
To: BrianS.Wise
Scott Ritter became a very hot propertyExactly! And it seems to me that he is loving every minute of it.
To: BrianS.Wise
64 posted on
09/13/2002 7:07:32 AM PDT by
hosepipe
To: BrianS.Wise
Ritter is being blackmailed. He secretly had an operation that rendered him capable of dating Janet Reno and Hillary.
To: BrianS.Wise
"If not, his [Ritter] true motivations should be known."
Follow the money.
71 posted on
09/13/2002 8:32:10 AM PDT by
MEGoody
To: BrianS.Wise
To the second question, one assumes Ritters new basis of knowledge comes either from the Iraqis themselves, or is simply a visceral, contrary reaction to a power he doesnt trust (that being the United States government).Man, this is where I'm lost. This morning, I was wondering how much closer to a line of treason he was willing to step. Do you have any idea? I mean, the guy talks to the Daquiri's! It seems he isn't going to backdown from continuing to bitch about the US approach of eradicating Saddam.
Well written essay. Keep it up.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson