Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: M. Thatcher
Iraq should hide it's weapons.

What part of "terms of surrender" -- as in, unconditional surrender -- do you not understand?
# 112 by M. Thatcher

*************************

If our national government decided tomorrow to ban all weapons ownership, millions of private arms would immediately "disappear" from official view.

That is an appropriate response to the tyranny of outlawing a basic right, the right of self-defense.

Just as an individual man has the right of defense, so a nation composed of men has that right.

116 posted on 09/14/2002 12:41:38 PM PDT by exodus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies ]


To: exodus
Just as an individual man has the right of defense, so a nation composed of men has that right.

You are an idiot. Iraq was defeated in a war. The victor dictates the terms of surrender. A defeated nation has NO "right of defense." ZIP. ZERO. NADA.

Did you know that Japan cannot have a military? Or is your understanding of history as deficient as your understanding of "rights."

122 posted on 09/14/2002 2:04:45 PM PDT by M. Thatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson