Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: exodus
Isn't this simply a matter of semantics?Had the resoltuions passed giving Bush congressional approval in 90-91 been declarations of war,you would have been ok with that?I don't think there is near as much "there" there as you think.
83 posted on 09/14/2002 8:45:19 AM PDT by John W
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]


To: John W
Bush Sr. should have busted his hump getting a Declaration of War from our Congress, instead of illegally delegating our war-making power to the United Nations. A war only needs the approval of Congress.

To: exodus
Isn't this simply a matter of semantics? Had the resoltuions passed giving Bush congressional approval in 90-91 been declarations of war,you would have been ok with that?I don't think there is near as much "there" there as you think.
# 83 by John W

*************************

It's a question of LAW.

Our law is based upon the Constitution. Any war conducted without following the strictures of the Constitution is illegal.

If Bush was my sovereign, I might disagree with his decision, but I wouldn't say that going to war on his decision alone was illegal.

Unfortunately for Bush, we live in a Republic.

87 posted on 09/14/2002 8:54:34 AM PDT by exodus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson