[First_Salute]

If on September 11, 2001, there had only been one flight hijacked, and it was Flight 93 --- who would be standing by these people who mustered as a militia, which is our right, and affected martial power against their common enemy?

I submit that the "higher-ups" of politico-Republi-canery would have joined with the pack of groupe-nationalizing socialist Democrats in the politics of personal destruction against each and every one of the militia.

No matter the feeble records from the militia, in the hands of the public --- in spite of the government efforts to squelch it.

The acts of the militia in the skies over Pennsylvania, would have been severely condemned as "taking the law into their own hands" as the worst of "the vast right-wing" ... and "see what these 'vigilantees' are like?!"

In addition, I submit that federal government's reaction would be exactly every step taken to date, both abroad and at home:

Surgical attacks upon some terrorists "over there," because the opportunity affords it, and strict inside the airport security here.

For you may see that from such steps taken, what actually is the response of the federal government and the Bush [still running 75% of the Clinton] Administration.

[Trickyguy]

What would I have done on Flight 93? I would have taken
my .357 Sig that I should been allowed to carry on the plane,
and shot every terrorist dead before they cut anyone's
throat.

[joanie-f]

Thanks for the ping, Mike. And for nailing -- with a forceful hammer, and a dead-eye aim -- the quibbling, un-American, pseudo-pacifist, anti-militia mindset.