I wonder why WE know that but the press doesn't.
Because the press would actually have had to listen to the President Speech and we know they can't do that
If we meet our responsibilities, if we overcome this danger, we can arrive at a very different future. The people of Iraq can shake off their captivity. They can one day join a democratic Afghanistan and a democratic Palestine, inspiring reforms throughout the Muslim world. These nations can show by their example that honest government, and respect for women, and the great Islamic tradition of learning can triumph in the Middle East and beyond. And we will show that the promise of the United Nations can be fulfilled in our time.
Neither of these outcomes is certain. Both have been set before us. We must choose between a world of fear and a world of progress. We cannot stand by and do nothing while dangers gather. We must stand up for our security, and for the permanent rights and the hopes of mankind. By heritage and by choice, the United States of America will make that stand. And, delegates to the United Nations, you have the power to make that stand, as well.
Me, me, pick me, teacher... Is it cause we really listened to the President's speech ? Hehehe.
I wonder why WE know that but the press doesn't.
Good question, and good catch. This should be the question of the week.
I've been wondering the same thing since reading the very first wire stories to come out the day of the president's speech.
The press has had plenty of time to correct the confusion...if it were an honest mistake, that is.