Rank | Company | System | tpmC | Price/tpmC | System Availability | Database | Operating System | TP Monitor | Date Submitted |
1 | ProLiant DL760-900-128P | 410,769 | 13.02 US $ | 10/15/01 | Microsoft SQL Server 2000 Enterprise Edition | Microsoft Windows 2000 Advanced Server | Microsoft COM+ | 09/19/01 | |
2 | ProLiant DL760-900-192P | 567,882 | 14.04 US $ | 10/15/01 | Microsoft SQL Server 2000 Enterprise Edition | Microsoft Windows 2000 Advanced Server | Microsoft COM+ | 09/19/01 | |
3 | ProLiant DL760-900-256P | 709,220 | 14.96 US $ | 10/15/01 | Microsoft SQL Server 2000 Enterprise Edition | Microsoft Windows 2000 Advanced Server | Microsoft COM+ | 09/19/01 | |
4 | IBM eServer xSeries 370 | 136,766 | 16.93 US $ | 09/20/01 | Microsoft SQL Server 2000 | Microsoft Windows 2000 Datacenter Server | Microsoft COM+ | 04/24/01 | |
5 | HP ProLiant DL580-PDC 32P C/S | 138,362 | 17.21 US $ | 03/05/03 | Oracle 9i R2 Enterprise Edition | Red Hat Linux Advanced Server | BEA Tuxedo 8.0 | 09/16/02 | |
6 | HP ProLiant DL580-0200032P c/s | 137,260 | 18.46 US $ | 06/04/02 | Oracle 9i R2 Enterprise Edition | Microsoft Windows 2000 Advanced Server | BEA Tuxedo 6.5 CTS | 06/04/02 | |
7 | IBM e(logo) xSeries 370 c/s | 440,879 | 19.35 US $ | 12/07/00 | IBM DB2 UDB 7.1 | Microsoft Windows 2000 Advanced Server | Microsoft COM+ | 04/11/01 | |
8 | IBM e(logo) xSeries 370 c/s | 363,129 | 21.80 US $ | 05/31/01 | Microsoft SQL Server 2000 | Microsoft Windows 2000 Datacenter Server | Microsoft COM+ | 04/10/01 | |
9 | IBM e(logo) xSeries 370 c/s | 688,220 | 22.58 US $ | 05/31/01 | Microsoft SQL Server 2000 | Microsoft Windows 2000 Datacenter Server | Microsoft COM+ | 04/10/01 |
But running on identical hardware, Linux runs faster, as shown by the chart.
Gee, I wonder what will happen when they put Linux on the same hardware as the number one scoring system?
Nice spin attempt, but once again, your FUD doesn't stand up to the light of day.
Back into your crack, cockroach, the lightswitch is on.