Have at it then, folks. ;)
Regards, Ivan
1 posted on
09/19/2002 9:05:05 AM PDT by
MadIvan
To: schmelvin; MJY1288; Teacup; rdb3; fivekid; jjm2111; LonePalm; Gracey; Aric2000; Happygal; ...
Bump!
2 posted on
09/19/2002 9:05:27 AM PDT by
MadIvan
To: Pokey78
Beat ya! 8^)
To: MadIvan
Mr. Steyn catalogues the trap the Rats were maneuvered into, but apparently thinks it is just dumb luck.
By the way, President Bush did not spend the summer doing nothing, as can be seen by who has lined up with us.
And it is Mr. Steyn's bad luck that Daschle caved yesterday, and the resolution was sent to Congress this morning, and it will have FORCE as an option.
I need to be in the pundit business. I was willing to give Steyn a break, but two columns in a row are way off mark. Jeesh!
To: MadIvan
I'm pretty convinced we can count on George to snatch defeat out of the jaws of victory.
It's a 'Bush Thang' after all.
12 posted on
09/19/2002 9:54:02 AM PDT by
mercy
To: MadIvan
>The American Prospect gave Minnesota leftie Senator Paul Wellstone the full Monica the other day in a drooling campaign profile broken up by sub-headings such as The Draw of Conscience. I believe in Pauls conscience, says Karen Jeffords, a mental-health worker.
Is this the same conscience who said he'd run only for two terms and then went back on his promise?
To: MadIvan
Actually, the only remaining question is how much longer the Democrats most visible spokesman can afford to go on making himself look like a total idiot. What question does he still need answered? Whats the capital of Iraq?BWAHAHAHAHA!!!HOOHOOHOOHOO!...HAHAHAHA!!
FMCDH
To: MadIvan
Steyn does have a gift, however, W has not taken the summer off. Sure I too want something done now but W has to jump through some hoops--or act like he does while the military gets ready and in place and they are. It will happen. The question is when. Soon, fer sure, but not until we are ready...
22 posted on
09/19/2002 10:07:32 AM PDT by
eureka!
To: MadIvan
Think it through.
Why is it that regime change in Iraq is such a desideratum? Supposedly, it's because Saddam sponsors terrorism and has WMD. I say has WMD, not will have: this is about Iraqi disarmament according to the White House, correct? And the WMD we are talking about are not nukes, right?
Why would he sponsor terrorism? To attack the United States and its allies behind a veil of deniability, correct?
What good would WMD do him -- inasmuch as he is not suicidal? Well, he could use them to blackmail the US from responding to such clandestine attacks.
So, what would a clandestine Iraqi-sponsored terrorist strike backed up with a threat to use WMD look like, exactly?
Figured it out yet?
To: MadIvan
Some issues are so serious, so important to the United States that they cant be discussed in the national legislature, mainly because they might reveal the yawning chasm between me and the American people. The eve of an election campaign is no time to start forcing politicians to make our views on major issues known to voters. An election ought to be about light-rail subsidies and which Senate candidate has the more stylish toupee.LOL! In a rational world, C-SPAN would hire Steyn to translate all comments by congress critters.
46 posted on
09/19/2002 12:48:11 PM PDT by
Stultis
To: scholar; Bullish
Ping
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson