[Torie]

Attacking Islam theologically the way it was here is not very constructive (e.g., the "theft" of Jewish theology stuff, which I doubt Jews would appreciate either, and borrowing between religions is hardly limited to Islam, and so what?), but Fox is a mere conduit. The personalities that said what they said should be the object of the ire, not Fox. But attacking Fox gets more notice.

[WOSG]

Attacking Islam theologically the way it was here is not very constructive (e.g., the "theft" of Jewish theology stuff, which I doubt Jews would appreciate either, and borrowing between religions is hardly limited to Islam, and so what?), but Fox is a mere conduit. The personalities that said what they said should be the object of the ire, not Fox. But attacking Fox gets more notice.

Actually, I think it is EXTREMELY instructive to explain the sources of Islam and WHY it is REALLY A DIFFERENT THEOLOGY and dispute the wholly erroneous idea that the underlying religion and theology is peaceful. It is not! Even if the vast majority of Muslims are peaceful people, the Quran itself is not instructing peace only! It promises heaven (72 irgins) for believers and for those who do the 'roght things', it wants idolators to be killed and/or put under the thumb of the believers (Dhimmi concept). Our secular culture has gotten so ignorant of religion people have not a clue what is written in these "HOly Books". Well, guess what, to the Wahabbis, it is an Instruction Manual. You cant understand a computer program without reading the source code ... same with a religious zealot. Robertsons comments are helpful for understanding the true mindset of Islamic radicalism.