Replies

But a little digging revealed that the people behind some of the screen names on both sides were actually DNC-types trying to drive a wedge between conservatives.

Wink! ;-|

Now you're getting it.

All, step back for a second. Remove yourselves temporarily from the debate and observe both openly and honestly. Of all of our small but vocal "anti-war" element, ask yourselves this one simple question:

What do they all have in common?

The answer to this question, above all others, makes the picture become crystal clear.

We are about to embark upon a war-effort through just cause, and we have an extremely important election coming up in a few short weeks. If America's interests are to be served, as many piously preach here, then we (conservatives) realize that the time for unity is right now. I mean right now! But what is with this tearing at our fabric?

Think. Then act accordingly, for both now and in November. The stakes are far too high not to do so.

PERFECT!!!!

I've avoided accusing those who naysay of being plants because I like to debate the merits, but unfortunately you both are probably correct.

ALL of the naysayers use the exact same arguments, without any concern or response to rebuttals, over and over, sometimes with the same wording.

The fact remains, it matters not WHAT side they may or may not be on, politically. The EFFECTS, and the RESULTS, are all the same: they benefit the Left and our enemies.

No "intentions" matter, either.

All, step back for a second. Remove yourselves temporarily from the debate and observe both openly and honestly. Of all of our small but vocal "anti-war" element, ask yourselves this one simple question:
What do they all have in common?
The answer to this question, above all others, makes the picture become crystal clear.

Thanks for the Ping and I am taking note