UGH...
1 posted on
09/21/2002 3:30:16 PM PDT by
vannrox
To: vannrox
Yawn. "They have not led. We shall."
To: vannrox
did'nt he already have a last chance about 15 resolutions ago?
5 posted on
09/21/2002 3:39:42 PM PDT by
linn37
To: vannrox
Saddam should be given the chance to avoid a war that seems inevitable He was. He blew it.
Now something else has been given a chance.
a.cricket
To: vannrox
Ah, come on! This is not about "inspections" - it's about at least disarmament and more likely regime change.
Putting "inspectors" (AKA hostages) in Iraq isn't going to do anything to get Saddam under control. It will just give him more time to get weaponry.
BTW, I am surprised to hear that he hasn't spent any of his money to re-inforce his conventional army since the Gulf War. That should be all the proof needed that he isn't looking for defense.
To: vannrox
Just look at the bright side, Donald. If Bush starts a good, big war with Iraq, The Independent will have so much more to bitch about! Where would you be with nothing to bitch about?
8 posted on
09/21/2002 4:10:49 PM PDT by
Cicero
To: vannrox
Give War A Chance
9 posted on
09/21/2002 4:13:48 PM PDT by
bert
To: vannrox
Bump
10 posted on
09/21/2002 4:15:21 PM PDT by
facedown
To: vannrox
Saddam will have more than ample time to show he has been house broken. The US won't be ready to attack until next February I suspect. This is really a non issue.
11 posted on
09/21/2002 5:13:01 PM PDT by
Torie
To: vannrox
12 years wasn't long enough and we should go for longer?
Why does that seem crazy to a sane guy like me?
I know, because that IS CRAZY!!!!!!!
15 posted on
09/21/2002 6:17:39 PM PDT by
A CA Guy
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson