Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Imal
Religions should not be treated differently under the law, and taxpayer-funded institutions, such as public schools, should not allow the promotion of one religion over another in any aspect of its operation. I have my own faith, and I'm quite happy with it. But I certainly don't wish to push it on others -- let alone have a government institution do so.

What you propose IS treating religion differently under the law. The Church, having bought its space, has free speech rights, just like everyone else. The school's policy is blatantly unconstitutional.

13 posted on 09/25/2002 5:41:36 AM PDT by yendu bwam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: yendu bwam
The school's policy is blatantly unconstitutional.

If that's so, then prohibiting beer ads, tobacco ads, political ads, ads for NAMBLA, ads for the local head shop, ad nauseatum, is also unconstitutional. What's being challenged here is the authority of school officials to decide what is or isn't appropriate to post on public school property.

Frankly, I think this is something of a straw man argument, because a more fundamental issue is whether or not the school should be selling ad space at all. If it's okay to do what the school is doing, then selling wall space for cigarette ads to raise money for lab equipment is no different.

Should public buildings be used as billboards? I think not. For one thing, issues like this one would be moot. For another, the idea of the word "PEPSI" painted down the length of the Washington Monument is somewhat distasteful to me, for some reason.

19 posted on 09/25/2002 6:34:11 AM PDT by Imal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson