HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
LET OUT SOME MORE GLORY AL!
Coup-de-grace (and you must wonder if they've hung onto something this devastating just for a moment like this).
The question becomes: how long will it take before all the know-it-all leftist (computer programmers/grad students/unemployed) self-proclaimed intelligence experts on the web each start posting their huge opuses designed to prove that, according to their research and expertise, the National Security Advisor is wrong in her information. Or lying about it for some reason.
It really oughta be entertaining. It's going to take quite some creativity, after all, for the knee-jerk antiwar leftists to explain why their intelligence information is superior to that of the NSA....
See if Condi Rice's information conforms to the "classified info" you have access to.
This is not aired until tomorrow?
Received form letter cop-out from Bingaman after numerous faxes to Domenici and him.
Sees no sign Saddam would use WMD on U.S. Worried that unilateral action would dilute focus. Afraid invasion would stretch military too thin.
Yo, Bingaman (who gave Charlie Trie a seat on his Beijing Commission), trust me: Saddam would.
"Dilute focus"? What are you focusing on--your navel?
"stretch military too thin"? Vote for the defense bill, dumbass.
No patient with Demodorks.
Send a SEAL team to find Daschle's privates. If any, place them next to his tonsils.
We aren't waiting for a NBC hit on a major city--let's roll.
I was just reading a history of WWII, and it said that the US and the Soviet Union worked together against Hitler. Now, this couldn't possibly be true. After all, the Soviets were communists and atheists, while the US was capitalistic and full of religious types---virtual opposites!
Mr. RUSSERT: One year ago when you were on MEET THE PRESS just five days after September 11, I asked you a specific question about Iraq and Saddam Hussein. Let’s watch:(Videotape, September 16, 2001):
Mr. RUSSERT: Do we have any evidence linking Saddam Hussein or Iraqis to this operation?
VICE PRES. CHENEY: No.
(End videotape)
Mr. RUSSERT: Has anything changed, in your mind?
VICE PRES. CHENEY: Well, I want to be very careful about how I say this. I’m not here today to make a specific allegation that Iraq was somehow responsible for 9/11. I can’t say that. On the other hand, since we did that interview, new information has come to light. And we spent time looking at that relationship between Iraq, on the one hand, and the al-Qaeda organization on the other. And there has been reporting that suggests that there have been a number of contacts over the years. We’ve seen in connection with the hijackers, of course, Mohamed Atta, who was the lead hijacker, did apparently travel to Prague on a number of occasions. And on at least one occasion, we have reporting that places him in Prague with a senior Iraqi intelligence official a few months before the attack on the World Trade Center. The debates about, you know, was he there or wasn’t he there, again, it’s the intelligence business.
Mr. RUSSERT: What does the CIA say about that and the president?
VICE PRES. CHENEY: It’s credible. But, you know, I think a way to put it would be it’s unconfirmed at this point. We’ve got...
Lemme quote from something you said:
In the case of Iraq, which we have been bombing non-stop ever since Clinton wagged the dog on the eve of his impeachment vote, it is not about fighting terrorism as Iraq has never been positively linked to any terrorist attacks against the US. As COL David Hackworth points out in his WND.com column, there really is no convincing rationale for invading Iraq.
How about this:
While it is true that Sadaam possess biological and chemical weapons, he has not used these weapons against us. Invading and ousting a sitting government just because "we think" they might attack us is a shaky and ambigious doctrine for which to place the safety of our nation and way of life.
I can think of about 3000 victims of the last attack who would disagree with you.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
LET OUT SOME MORE GLORY AL!
The trap is to let the Dashholes and Gores of the world question his Iraq initiative, get firmly on the record as opposing the war and then hit them and their weak-kneed Democratic candidates with the evidence conveniently close to the election.
Is this politicizing the war? Yes it is and there is nothing wrong with it. If the Dems want to play to their 60's hippy clientele then they can pay for it in the election which is now only a few weeks away.
They are in a trap and they know it. That is the reason for the Dashhole flare up today. They are desperate to get Bush’s War on Terrorism/Iraqi war poll numbers down. The loss of the Senate and a bigger Republican majority in the house is coming at them like a freight train if they can’t turn this around and they are frightened to death at the prospect.
Brilliant Bush politics in my opinion.
 |
U.S. intelligence has detected what appears to be an al Qaeda training camp in a remote region of eastern Iran along the border with Afghanistan, NBC News reported on September 25, 2002, citing unidentified sources. The network said it was told by its sources that overhead imagery of the site shows a suspected terrorist camp that includes a driving course and rifle range very much like al Qaeda camps in Afghanistan that were used to train for assassinations. (Reuters Graphic) - Sep 25 10:29 PM ET |