Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: M. Peach
Neither Saddam nor any other bad guy will do anything 'til after the election. The dems are their buddies and they know they will get Clintonian treatment if the dems hold the senate where Biden, Kennedy and Dashole are their representatives and spokesmen. Action before the election would guarantee the election of Republican majorities in both houses. The Republicans are the enemies of the bad guys and the bad guys are reasonably sure that Bush intends to hunt them down.

After the election, Saddam might make such an anouncement but I don't think so. He has large numbers of Muslims around the world who may not be trusted any more, but they are not persecuted. Such a threat would put most of them under the gun.

No, Saddam's best tactic would be to attack after the election but not take credit. Direct credit permits retaliation ("Go ahead, make my day!") and I don't think he'd do that. The attack has to come from sources that will allow Dashole, Kennedy, Biden and the French to say, "We don't have sufficient proof." and urge that we continue to do nothing and take hits. I'm reasonably sure that if we were to see Dashole income tax returns, we'd find that his bag lady wife's consulting firm has several Saddam fronts as major clients.

14 posted on 09/28/2002 9:51:13 AM PDT by Tacis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Tacis
Just heard on Fox News from Tariq Azziz - "If the U.S. attacks Iraq, they will suffer deaths not seen for decades...."
45 posted on 09/28/2002 11:06:51 AM PDT by M. Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson