Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Police Eye Man in Chandra Levy Case
Drudge, Washington Post | September 29, 2002

Posted on 09/28/2002 5:15:40 PM PDT by Peach

Police are looking at a man who attacked two joggers in Washington, D.C. in the same area where Chandra was found. The man initially passed a polygraph which police now believe was flawed due to language problems. The suspect is currently in jail for attacking two women.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: chandra; condit; donutwatch; gary; levy

1 posted on 09/28/2002 5:15:41 PM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Peach
Old story nothing new here.
2 posted on 09/28/2002 5:21:27 PM PDT by dts32041
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peach
Do they think he kept a scorecard?
3 posted on 09/28/2002 5:22:15 PM PDT by NativeNewYorker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peach
Well, they can't say now that they have evidence based on DNA...this all screams cover-up, if you ask me...
4 posted on 09/28/2002 5:24:20 PM PDT by Sunshine55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NativeNewYorker
Police are looking at a man who attacked two joggers in Washington, D.C.

Maybe it's that fat guy, who is suing the fast food restaurants for "causing" his obesity.

5 posted on 09/28/2002 5:25:27 PM PDT by Paul Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Peach
Illegal alien Ingmar Guandique?

Possible, but I still say Condidit.

6 posted on 09/28/2002 5:27:52 PM PDT by martin_fierro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sunshine55
I know. It will probably have to be videotaped evidence for me to believe Condit didn't do it.
7 posted on 09/28/2002 5:28:16 PM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Peach
Why don't they just pin it on the same guy they pinned the Starbuck murders on? Never mind that he says he was in jail at the time, he's obviously lying.
8 posted on 09/28/2002 5:28:24 PM PDT by Cicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peach
recently found a hard contact lens at the site

An amazing find...one of the toughest items on the planet to locate in any setting.

9 posted on 09/28/2002 5:28:28 PM PDT by NautiNurse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
THIS FAT GUY??


10 posted on 09/28/2002 5:29:29 PM PDT by EggsAckley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NautiNurse
Yeah and they can't locate a 2 foot long legbone, for Christ's sake...
11 posted on 09/28/2002 5:30:23 PM PDT by Sunshine55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Sunshine55
"Well, they can't say now that they have evidence based on DNA...this all screams cover-up, if you ask
me.."

Huh. What od you mean?
12 posted on 09/28/2002 5:30:29 PM PDT by lawdude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Peach
The man initially passed a polygraph which police now believe was flawed due to language problems.


13 posted on 09/28/2002 5:32:32 PM PDT by Thinkin' Gal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EggsAckley
Oh man! I still have to eat supper, y'know. ;-)
14 posted on 09/28/2002 5:36:37 PM PDT by Paul Atreides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Peach
A flawed polygraph. Now there's a shocker! < /SARCASM >
15 posted on 09/28/2002 5:38:27 PM PDT by CounterCounterCulture
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thinkin' Gal
Good ol' Chief Ramsey!
16 posted on 09/28/2002 5:39:10 PM PDT by CounterCounterCulture
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Paul Atreides
Imagine how I feel.
I was just about to eat a donut.
17 posted on 09/28/2002 5:39:35 PM PDT by EllaMinnow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: lawdude
crock o' sh-t! the circle is closed...it will be pinned on grandjean and ole gary will get a high paying job as a lobbyist. his buddies will hold on to their congressional seats and everything will be hush, hush......or will it. is there anyone in DC who has a sense of right and wrong?? nah! of course not.
18 posted on 09/28/2002 5:40:24 PM PDT by contessa machiaveli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: CounterCounterCulture
The man initially passed a polygraph which police now believe was flawed due to language problems.

Leave it to the DC police, they couldn't find their arses in a snowstorm...what a bunch of keystones!

19 posted on 09/28/2002 5:41:32 PM PDT by KLT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Peach; *Donut watch
Look at this crap...OMG...how embarrassing PING!
20 posted on 09/28/2002 5:42:56 PM PDT by KLT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: contessa machiaveli
All people in power protect their own...and as disgusting as Condit is and was....he will be protected...You're right contessa!
21 posted on 09/28/2002 5:44:51 PM PDT by KLT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Comment #22 Removed by Moderator

To: KLT
Why is this coming out today? This is the same thing we had heard months ago.
23 posted on 09/28/2002 5:49:22 PM PDT by Unknown Freeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: lawdude
They've already stated that they HAVE no DNA...if some magically appears now, I'll be more convinced than ever that Chandra was not in that park all those months...
24 posted on 09/28/2002 5:54:26 PM PDT by Sunshine55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: All
Personally, I think Chandra would have kicked Iggy's ass...was it him? Nah...it was someone she trusted. Someone she had plans to meet at Klingle Mansion that day, and we all know who it was.
25 posted on 09/28/2002 5:59:18 PM PDT by Sunshine55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Fred Mertz
Did we hear of this guy before and he was excluded for some reason?
26 posted on 09/28/2002 6:01:11 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Sunshine55
"They've already stated that they HAVE no DNA"

Whose DNA don't they have?
27 posted on 09/28/2002 6:07:08 PM PDT by lawdude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro; Peach
Possible, but I still say Condidit.

I still say you need proof.

28 posted on 09/28/2002 6:12:40 PM PDT by Houmatt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: KLT
missing girls and women are stories for the summer months. let's move on everyone.... the media are on to the next story. this is too sad for words.
29 posted on 09/28/2002 6:17:32 PM PDT by contessa machiaveli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Unknown Freeper
Don't know Unknown....Guess the newsmedia outlets were bored or something...
30 posted on 09/28/2002 6:25:14 PM PDT by KLT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Peach
Naaaaa. It was the same 'some porta rician guy' that OJs looking for. (from South Park).
31 posted on 09/28/2002 6:26:49 PM PDT by fella
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Houmatt
I still say you need proof.

Maybe if I were the prosecutor. As John Q. Public, I'm entitled to my opinion, based on what may be less than "beyond a reasonable doubt."

You, of course, are entitled to your own off-the-wall theory.

32 posted on 09/28/2002 6:44:24 PM PDT by martin_fierro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro
Sorry folks. When Condit comes up with an alibi for the few hours on the afternoon of May 1, I'll consider someone else but the time sheet (and the lies) point to Condit.

That lady had no reason to be in that park except to meet Gary and his "4 eyed" alibi (you know...the creep who helped him dump the watch).

Sac

33 posted on 09/28/2002 7:09:51 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
Sorry, Sac, but a supposed lack of alibi means less than zero. And the other thing you mentioned is pure speculation. Can someone place Condit at that park at the time where he has no alibi? Nope. Guess what? You have nothing. Get over it.
34 posted on 09/28/2002 7:42:52 PM PDT by Houmatt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
Sounds good to me!
35 posted on 09/28/2002 9:28:34 PM PDT by martin_fierro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro; Peach; All
NY Daily News story:

New look at Levy suspect

Cops question polygraph test of park predator

By HELEN KENNEDY
DAILY NEWS WASHINGTON BUREAU



WASHINGTON - Police investigating Chandra Levy's slaying are looking with renewed interest at a park predator they had initially discounted because he passed a polygraph test.
Ingmar Guandique, 21, was arrested in July 2001, two months after Levy vanished. He was convicted of assaulting two female joggers at knifepoint in the same general area of Rock Creek Park where Levy's skeleton was found this year.

A source close to the investigation said last night the polygraph test might have been flawed because the Salvadoran native was questioned through a translator.

The source said on condition of anonymity that investigators think there might be "some kind discrepancy" in the first test because of the language barrier.

They want the second test to be administered by someone who speaks Spanish.

Police dismissed Guandique as a suspect last year, despite the sentencing judge's comment that his behavior was "predatory" and inconsistent with the attempted robbery to which he had confessed.

However, a fellow inmate failed a polygraph after telling police Guandique confessed to him. Moreover, police were skeptical that Levy's killer would return to the same location and then let his subsequent targets fight him off, as both Guandique's victims did.

In addition, both of those women were tall and blond, but Levy was a petite brunette.

Because of damage to a small bone in Levy's neck, the coroner believes she was strangled, not stabbed.

Levy, 24, was known to avoid jogging in the park, and her remains were found in a remote area, 5 miles from her apartment, suggesting she was meeting someone rather than running.

Condit's 'close friend'

Her "very close friend," Rep. Gary Condit (D-Calif.), denied knowing anything about what happened to the former federal intern, but he ducked some questions and refusing to take an FBI polygraph.

Condit's apartment was searched, his records scoured and his DNA taken. He was called before a grand jury in April and was reported to have refused to answer questions.

Police are now looking away from Condit, struck by similarities among the park attacks.

The two women Guandique attacked — on May 14 and July 1, 2001 — were wearing portable tape players and headphones, allowing him to come up from behind and grab them.

He told police he was trying to steal the players, not rape or kill the women, but he didn't steal either machine.

Levy's radio headphones were found with her jogging clothes and bones May 22.

http://www.nydailynews.com/front/story/22654p-21491c.html
36 posted on 09/29/2002 7:54:01 AM PDT by mountaineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: mountaineer
Since when are polygraphs necessary evidence?
37 posted on 09/30/2002 5:06:14 AM PDT by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson