Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Packing' for trip just invites trouble
Dail y Press ^ | 9/29/2002 | Jim Spencer

Posted on 09/29/2002 6:55:21 AM PDT by Joe Brower

'Packing' for trip just invites trouble
September 27 2002
Jim Spencer

Homeboy tightened the Velcro strap on the holster around his ankle and shoved in a snub-nosed semiautomatic pistol.

My God, I said, as I walked in the room, what are you doing?

"Packing," he said.

I can see that, I told him. You must be headed to downtown Newport News where those three guys got murdered and three others got wounded last weekend.

Click HERE for the rest of the article.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailypress.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: antigunscreed; banglist; concealedcarry; guns; hoplophobia; liberalcrybabies; nationofcowards; rkba

People can argue any way they want about guns, pro or con. If some people wish to be victims, then that is their right, but they have no right to demand that all of us dictate that our lives are subject to the whims of criminals. And anyone who will not act in their own self-defense, yet expects others to come to their aid simply because it is "their job", hold a point of view that is, at best, morally bankrupt.

I urge everyone here to read Jeff's Snyder's excellent book "Nation of Cowards". This collection of essays goes far deeper than the mere "right to own guns", and cuts to the ethical quick of the ideas and philosophies that underly all of our inalienable rights. Once you have read this book, you will never view the "gun debate" or the "gun grabbers" in the same way ever again, nor for that matter, the actions of our government in it's utilitarian desire to strip us of our rights and liberties. The very concepts espoused by the utilitarian viewpoint are a total vote of no-confidence in We The People, and anathema to the very concept of indvidual freedom.

You want the heaviest caliber ammunition you can carry for the "gun control debate"?
Here it is.

Click on the graphic or CLICK HERE to purchase this excellent treatise on the moral obligations and responsibilities that are part and parcel of being a free people. The price is only $15 a copy and the book is a very quick and worthwhile read. It also makes for a great birthday or Christmas gift. Please note that I have no affiliation with the publisher or author of this book. My only motivation here is to inform and empower those of us who still know, honor, cherish and seek to protect our human freedoms and dignity. Tell them FreeRepublic.com sent you!

For a sample, I have the main essay from which the book is titled on my website in PDF format HERE .


1 posted on 09/29/2002 6:55:22 AM PDT by Joe Brower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: *bang_list
MWLWN LABE

2 posted on 09/29/2002 6:55:48 AM PDT by Joe Brower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower

Win one for the Gipper! God Bless You Reagan, We Will Never Forget Your Great Service and Leadership - We here on FR will carry on your great work with diligence. Thanks for the Memories and Inspiration!

Donate here by secure server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

3 posted on 09/29/2002 6:58:35 AM PDT by terilyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower
...a snub-nosed semiautomatic pistol...

What the hell is that?

I want one too. Anybody got a source?

Typical dumbass liberal kneejerk panty-waist that thinks a gun is gonna jump out of a holster and kill him, without any conscious movement or desire of the owner.

And I don't know anyone that carries a "long-barrelled" .44 mag in a shoulder holster, especially if they are trying to conceal it.

This is just more anti-gun hysteria from the sissy boy journalists that hang on every liberal demonrat words of Gun Control, Inc.

4 posted on 09/29/2002 7:22:28 AM PDT by OldSmaj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower
Jim Spencer is full of the same tired "guns cause crime" crappola as the rest of the disarmament crowd. What a wuss.
5 posted on 09/29/2002 7:41:09 AM PDT by metesky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower
And the use of the name "Homeboy" is meant to conjure an image of a slope-browed mouth breather.

Disgusting.

6 posted on 09/29/2002 7:42:59 AM PDT by metesky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: metesky
Jim Spencer is full of the same tired "guns cause crime" crappola....

Consider Vermont and Washington DC. VT has a little over 600,000 inhabitants (96.2% white)and is the only state that allows concealed carry without a ccw permit. DC is more diverse and has about 575,000 people (72.8% minorities) and totally bans handguns. There are 41.8 murders per 100K population in DC and 1.5 in VT. The DC violent crime rate is 1507 and 113 in VT.

It's not the number or caliber of guns that cause crime. It is the number and caliber of people that cause crime. Diversity is not our strength, but guns are our defense.

7 posted on 09/29/2002 8:07:01 AM PDT by umgud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower
More guns less crime bump.

In the year 2002, elections are no longer about protecting our freedoms. Elections are now about REGAINING freedoms we have already lost. It is up to us to live in 'My America' (or 'Your America), where the Constitution means what it says, and it is our task to ultimately punish those who have stolen our freedom, those democrats, socialists, and muslims who spit on our flag and hate our people because we were born 'free'.

8 posted on 09/29/2002 10:22:12 AM PDT by Darheel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldSmaj
And I don't know anyone that carries a "long-barrelled" .44 mag in a shoulder holster, especially if they are trying to conceal it.

You should meet my Dad, he carried a Army Air Corp issue .45 Colt revolver with a 6" barrel in a shoulder holster.

It was intended for pilots. The issue holster was split all the way down the front and had a spring steel clip that held it in place. My Dad is stocky and could easily carry it under a light jacket.

He 'presented' it one time while working as a construction boss in Philadelphia in the '60s. A black union shop stewart was 'admiring' my Dad's emerald and diamond ring. He cautioned my Dad to be careful one of his brothers didn't take it from him. My Dad told him he wasn't worried about it. He kept pressing it, till my Dad whupped out the Colt. My Dad said his eyes literally bugged out of his head.

His final comment was, "Mr. Rider, you'll have no problems in the city of "Brotherly Love".

9 posted on 09/29/2002 10:39:46 AM PDT by TC Rider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower
Spencer the author, is an idiot.

Aside from his total lack of knowledge of firearms (snub nosed automatic?) what's he scared of?

He should know that virtually every gun control law or 'regulation' from the 30's, had more to do with Jim Crow laws than public safety.

It blows me away when the libs keep supporting some of the most racist laws on the books.
10 posted on 09/29/2002 10:42:12 AM PDT by TC Rider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower
(My letter to firearms expert, Jim Spence)

Jim,

Shame on you. Your first sentence shows your total lack of knowledge on this subject.

There is no such thing as a 'snubnose' automatic pistol. It's either a snubnose revolver, or a small automatic.

My Dad carried an Army Colt .45 revolver for years under a jacket with no problems of concealment, and it was larger than most .44 magnums today.

One would almost think that you had invented this whole story, guns, 'homeboy' and all, just to make a typical liberal point about gun control.

I'm also certain the families of the two lesbians killed while camping on the Appalachian Trail a few years ago may take issue with the safety of forests and parks.

Your use of the nickname, 'homeboy', is also insulting.

Especially when used in connection with a regulation of the '30s. Aren't you aware that gun laws and regulations of the '30s are "Jim Crow" laws, intended to deprive the 'negroes' of their civil rights and to keep them disarmed?

I'm calling you a liar, or an incompent fool, and your editor should check your sources.

TC Rider
Apex, NC
11 posted on 09/29/2002 10:57:13 AM PDT by TC Rider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: metesky
conjure an image of a slope-browed mouth breather.

HEY! Is that a shot at us slope browed folks with alergies?

12 posted on 09/29/2002 7:56:59 PM PDT by TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower
Who want to bet me that this story is a total fabrication? Any care to wager money on whether this scenario actually happened?
13 posted on 09/29/2002 8:04:29 PM PDT by Double Tap
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Double Tap; TC Rider
I have no doubt at all that the story was totally made up. Oh, but that's just "journalist license". Anyway, it's OK for this shill to lie, after all, the ends justfies the means -- it's "for the children", after all.


14 posted on 09/30/2002 1:30:00 AM PDT by Joe Brower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower
I guess my biggest complaint is that this hack can't even make it believable.
15 posted on 09/30/2002 8:20:54 AM PDT by TC Rider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson