Skip to comments.
Forrester Statement On New Jersey Supreme Court Decision
Forrester 2002
| 10/2/2002
| Forrester 2002
Posted on 10/02/2002 5:16:31 PM PDT by Politico2
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 281-290 next last
To: Political Junkie Too
Time's a wasting. Let's see if Lautenberg stalls on a debate. He only has 34 days now. Let's get this campaign moving. Does he really want a campaign or does he just want to stall his way in to the Senate?
Lautenberg needs to show the people of New Jersey what he's made of.
-PJ
To: Politico2
Don't get mad -- Get the Senate!!! Let's all send $25 to the National Republican Senatorial Committee via
www.nrsc.org.
I've only given to a candidate once and that was about 12 years ago. I'm giving again today! Those dirty, cheating S.O.B. Dems will pay in November.
22
posted on
10/02/2002 5:24:50 PM PDT
by
inkling
To: Politico2
I don't know who said this guy didn't have issues, but clearly he not only has THREE good ones, but he has already got the phrase the "Torricelli-Lautenberg Machine" humming. This almost makes me suspect he knew the outcome before the Torch made his announcement and had the campaign ready to go.
23
posted on
10/02/2002 5:25:06 PM PDT
by
LS
To: PhiKapMom
To: Always Right
You must be mistaken Whitman for a Republican.
But Christie T. was a "moderate" and a GOP press darling!
To: Politico2
The Torricelli – Lautenberg MachineBINGO!
Now everyone with me...
The Torricelli – Lautenberg Machine
The Torricelli – Lautenberg Machine
The Torricelli – Lautenberg Machine
The Torricelli – Lautenberg Machine
The Torricelli – Lautenberg Machine
The Torricelli – Lautenberg Machine
The Torricelli – Lautenberg Machine
To: Politico2
the Torricelli-Lautenberg machine I like the linkage.
27
posted on
10/02/2002 5:26:14 PM PDT
by
Dog Gone
To: Politico2
Outstanding statement! I think that Forrester will win....assuming that the votes are cast and counted without the fraud. That of course is a big assumption.
Hammer home on the "Torricelli-Lautenberg" point!
To: Sir Gawain
I heard that there was a 4-3 split on the NJ Soprano Court. Four Democrats and three Republicans. I really do not understand why the three Republicans did not cast dissenting votes on this. Anyone have a clue? Or is it really a Soprano Court?
To: Sabertooth
Well, I would be happy to impeach them, but since they have to be impeached by the legislature, which is a Rat majority, it isn't going to happen.
I think right now our best weapon is ridicule.
To: Politico2
Good job Forrester
To: Politico2
Give 'em Hell, Doug!!!
To: Magnum44
Wow. If the return for tax dollars in NJ is worse than here in CA, things must be pretty bad. The numbers I've seen run in the 67 to 69 cents on the dollar range. Connecticut is about as bad.
Forrester should find the exact current numbers and use them in his ads. Put it this way, "For every dollar that New Jersey sends to the Federal government, we lose over 30 cents. That also means that for every dollar we cut in Federal taxes, over 30 cents stay in New Jersey. So why would New Jersey want a Senator who likes high Federal taxes?"
To: Politico2
Great Speech, all the right words and I love this: I will continue to stand against the Torricelli-Lautenberg machine. Hang on, New Jersey help is on the way!?
To: Miss Marple
Hey, Miss Marple, here's an ad suggestion. Just have the black screen that Forrester is using for his ads now. Flash "Torricelli-Lautenberg" and each time it flashes list something they have or have not done from the list above. The theme from the Sopranos can be the background music.
To: Johnny Shear
to lazy to type all that just put me down for the
TORCH AND LOUT MACHINE
36
posted on
10/02/2002 5:29:18 PM PDT
by
linn37
To: MJY1288
Like this!
DEMAND DEBATES NOW!!!!
37
posted on
10/02/2002 5:29:25 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: linn37
I like it!
38
posted on
10/02/2002 5:29:49 PM PDT
by
Howlin
To: Sir Gawain
"Not bad. But six of the judges were appointed by a Republican." OK...but, who among us would choose to cross the equivalent of Tony Soprano?
To: sam_paine
Drop the lawsuit part of this speech, and you're on the right track Doug! Either BEAT the Lautenberg-Torch-Dashle-Xlinton Machine, or shut the hell up!! The SCONJ are scofflaws, and the Dims are thugs...but buck up and beat them at their own game. Period.How is wussing out in the courts beating them at their own game?
40
posted on
10/02/2002 5:30:18 PM PDT
by
#3Fan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 281-290 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson