Replies

Why do you think there is basis to this theory, if you think there are no facts or strong links to Iraq? If you don't answer, I won't know where to begin. (and It will confirm that you are disingenuous -----Triple

Wow, where simple questions lead!

Anyways let me explain to you why i think there is a basis to this yet i do not see any strong linkages to Iraq on the OKC bombing. It is as follows.

I see a basis in this 'conspiracy' because a lot of things do not make sense. The reports coming aftre the bombing are totally different from those a few days later. There are also people who are saying (and are in positions that allow them to know) that there was some sort of coverup, that the suspects were changed, and that what should have been a pretty straight forward investigation has become mired in controversy and thoroughly nebulous.

Hence my saying there seems to be a basis for a conspiracy since the ground is well seeded for it. And that is also why i said i believe there is something here the public does not know.

However that is where i go to the second part of my premise where i said that although i think there is a basis for a conspiracy theory (after all there are very many question marks), even though there are questionmarks there is no direct solid proof. Up to now what we have is hearsay and speculation (there are people who have solid credentiasl who are saying there is something nefarious afoot, however officially they are marginalized). This is not to say there is no conspiracy ...it just means no concrete linkages have been established (or maybe a better statement is that no concrete linkages have been released to the public domain).

Hence my assertion that although i think there is a basis for this theory yet i do not see any strong links or facts. I hope that answers your question.

at this point let me re-emphasise that i do not know why you are being so acerbic! I was just asking some darn question yet you are acting like i threw stones at your holy cow!

and then you make statements as follows: If you don't answer, I won't know where to begin. (and It will confirm that you are disingenuous)

Please tell me how i am being 'disingenous' in asking a question. And also how come only you two are feeling disturbed by my questions (i have had 4 Freepmail messages from Freepers and they have answered my questions comprehensively without trying to tell me how long they have been on FR or calling me 'disingenous!'

However you and FlameFront seem to be acting like i commited anathema or something! FlameFront accused me of having a 'politically frozen attitude' while you have said my not answering your question will 'confirm that i am disingenous!' Actually this is hilarious. FlameFront had made a point that i am a 'newbie' because i registered months ago instead of years ago ....and both of you are people who have been on FR for years. However your statements nullify and completely negate any point that states being on FR for years makes someone 'better.' After all all the people who freepmailed me have been on FR for much less time than either of you two, however none of those people tried to 'confirm i am disingenous' or called me 'politically frozen.' None of them ...they just answered the questions and then gave me their personal opinions. However you two fellas seem to try to dig up things that are not there!

And if that makes me 'disingenous' Triple all i can say is i am glad you are the only one who thinks so.

And if my saying so is 'disingenous' then ....hmmmmm.....i guess i must be!

However i can assure you that no matter how 'disingenous' you might think me to be when i asked the questions i was simply asking questions and looking for answers. However i guess when Freepers stay on FR for years they acquire clairvoyant abilities to detect 'disingenous newbies!'

Now i need to rush off and do something Triple, so if you ask another question with the following tag (If you don't answer, I won't know where to begin. (and It will confirm that you are disingenuous) and i take too long to answer then that is because i am away from my computer. Hence my 'disingenuity' will be due to my being away not from hiding due to my 'political freeze' and unabated disingenuity.'