To: twigs
Yes, and Bush et al. might figure something along the lines of "Why ruin a good thing until it's necessary?" I'm convinced this is connected to all the big questions about Iraq. Seems so simple to me...They obviously don't want to tell us, maybe don't want to scare us, maybe believe they are outsmarting Sadaam. It's understandable, just don't know that it's the right thing to do.
To: glorygirl
Another reason this man cited for not making the explicit connection to Saddam is that he said Davis did not have evidence linking the OKC bombing to him. He said that it was entirely possible that they did this on their own. Although he did say how the tattoos one of the men (I think John Doe #2) had on his arm, an anchor wrapped with a snake, probably signified he was part of a Marine unit of Saddam's Republican Guard.
The other man also said that it's possible the tattoed man had been tapped for this job while he was still in captivity, although Smerconish brushed past this. I thought it was one of the most interesting ideas in the entire broadcast. Smerconish talks very fast (ala Chris Matthews) and I think he probably did not hear what his guest actually said b/c he was talking over him. That needs some exploration.
54 posted on
10/03/2002 1:03:06 PM PDT by
twigs
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson