Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: The Great Satan
On re-reading McVeigh's letter, it seems clear that he is emotionally attached to Hussein/Iraq. Reading between the lines, he is betraying the probability that OKC was an Iraqi operation and that he is proud of having played a part. The fact that he never mentioned the disproportion of the damage to be expected from his truck bomb viz. the total destruction that actually occurred, leads me to think that he was in on the whole thing. Maybe he was a patsy, but we'll never know what he thought because he was snuffed out as soon as possible. In any case, his letter is tantamount to an admission that Hussein was behind it.
58 posted on 10/03/2002 1:49:05 PM PDT by Misterioso
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: Misterioso
McVeigh’s essay was dated March 1998

The fatwa signed by Sheikh Usamah Bin-Muhammad Bin-Ladin and Ayman al-Zawahiri, leader of the Jihad Group in Egypt, et al, was published in Al-Quds al-'Arabi on Febuary 23, 1998:

"...despite the great devastation inflicted on the Iraqi people by the crusader-Zionist alliance, and despite the huge number of those killed, in excess of 1 million... despite all this, the Americans are once against trying to repeat the horrific massacres, as though they are not content with the protracted blockade imposed after the ferocious war or the fragmentation and devastation."

"The ruling to kill the Americans and their allies--civilians and military--is an individual duty for every Muslim who can do it in any country in which it is possible to do it..."

"O ye who believe, what is the matter with you, that when ye are asked to go forth in the cause of God, ye cling so heavily to the earth! Do ye prefer the life of this world to the hereafter? But little is the comfort of this life, as compared with the hereafter. Unless ye go forth, He will punish you with a grievous penalty, and put others in your place; but Him ye would not harm in the least."

You could say that McVeigh took the advice on preferring "the hereafter," rather than talk. Or did he fear that others (his family) would be the victims of a "grevous penalty?"

Didn't McVeigh flunk out of special ops training? I heard someone on Fox say that Scott Ritter was turned down by the CIA. It seems that Saddam has a knack for recruiting frustrated and bitter wannabe's with authority issues.

59 posted on 10/03/2002 2:11:40 PM PDT by browardchad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson