[MeekOneGOP]

.....Let Forrester take his name off the ballot and the GOP install someone with a known "name" - i.e., Rudy G. What can the DNC going to do about it?

You know what? I've been wondering what the DIMocRATS would say/do if someone in the GOP decided "what's good for the goose is good for the gander" myself. I would imagine that they would scream their heads off and not even consider how hypocritical that would be. The DIMocRATic Party is the party of the Ethically Challenged.

In any case, I hope that SCOTUS does the right thing and pitches this in the dumper.

[Peach]

I'm hoping the SCOTUS will take the case but think it's doubtful. Public relations and all that. The next best thing - at LEAST threaten to take Forrester off the ballot and replace with Rudy. That would wake up even the Democrat voters to what's going on here. Otherwise, the sheeple just don't get it.

[Greeklawyer]

"....party of the Ethically Challenged. ..."

Dems are not ethically challenged because they follow the letter of the ethics rules. There is no controlling legal authority to the contrary.

Morally however, they do not care. Since they have moral relativism. This is why the are consistently inconsistent. (Hawaii vs NJ vs Penn.) The dems. parse words. An nitpick definitions of what "is" is. The only mission and sole goal is aquisition of power and excluding others from doing the same. They are not enlighted to any higher purpose other than personal power over others.