Thanks.It goes as follows:
Article I, section 4 reads:
"The times, places and manner of holding elections for Senators and Representatives, shall be prescribed in each state by the legislature (not courts) thereof; but the Congress may at any time by law make or alter such regulations, except as to the places of choosing Senators."
You being a professor and have NO CLUE that the NJSC just ignored law with no rhyme or reason to their decision befuddles me as well as other pro-Contitutionalists.
It is obvious that the DNC is trying to circumvent their predicted loss to Forrester by pulling him and putting a name that NJ voters would recognize in hopes to win the seat. The NJSC did not even focus on Torricelli's reason for leaving the election besides the fact that he would lose. This is not a catastrophic reason mandating a replacement. Any High School grad could see that but you can't?
You are either a political hack blatantly ignoring law or ignorant. I pity the students in your classes. You are teaching them how to be stellar DNC lawyers it sounds.
Sincerely, < name removed >
Thanks.