[1Old Pro]

"There is absolutely no federal question involved, and there's absolutely no reason for the Supreme Court to take this case," said Frank Askin, professor at Rutgers University/Newark law school. "But I said the same thing about Bush vs. Gore, so what do I know?"

He knows how to be a Dem Partisan hack professor who teaches kids how to be partisan dem lawyers.

Look at the photo of Lautenberg. Not firing on all cylinders I'd say.

[Leavemealone]

I have a question that I'm sure some Freeper can answer for me.

In Bush V Gore didn't the SCOTUS have two votes that day.
Wasn't there a 7 - 2 vote to declare the Florida SC decision unconstitutional on Due Process grounds. Every article (and democrat) always says a 5-4 decision gave the presidency to Bush with out mentioning this 7 - 2 vote.

Can someone tell me if this is how it went or if I dreamed it?