Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cornyn sees Texas jobs in Alaska refuge - Oil plan also improves security; Kirk favors alternatives
The Dallas Morning News ^ | October 5, 2002 | By TODD J. GILLMAN / The Dallas Morning News

Posted on 10/05/2002 3:42:18 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP


Cornyn sees Texas jobs in Alaska refuge

Oil plan also improves security, he says; Kirk camp favors alternatives

10/05/2002

By TODD J. GILLMAN / The Dallas Morning News

WICHITA FALLS - Drilling for oil in the Alaskan wilderness would boost national security and create Texas jobs, GOP Senate nominee John Cornyn said on Friday, and he accused his rival of siding with "environmental extremists" and against President Bush on the issue.

"There's one way that we can hopefully improve our national security, and that is by relying less and less on imported energy from troubled regions of the world like the Middle East," Mr. Cornyn said during a visit to Cactus Oil Tools Inc., an oilfield supply company in Wichita Falls.

Democrat Ron Kirk opposes the push to open Alaska's environmentally sensitive Arctic National Wildlife Refuge to oil exploration. Spokesman Robert Gibbs said Mr. Kirk wants to use tax incentives to encourage domestic oil production and reduce dependence on imports, but sees far more effective projects than using the refuge.

The issue is a prime example of the stakes in the November elections.

Mr. Bush has made drilling in Alaska a centerpiece of the energy plan formulated by the task force led by Vice President Dick Cheney. The House, narrowly controlled by Republicans, passed an energy bill earlier this year modeled after that panel's recommendations.

But the Senate, where Democrats hold a one-seat majority, adopted its own version that omits Alaska drilling, and the issue remains stalemated. Environmental groups and other opponents are concerned about industrializing a region that is home to polar bears, caribou, musk oxen and wolves.

Given that the Alaska drilling project is the main sticking point between the House and Senate versions, and that Mr. Kirk supports the House version, Mr. Gibbs said the clash shows that Mr. Cornyn prefers posturing to finding common ground.

"The question that has to be put to John Cornyn is, are we going to take 99 percent of what's been agreed upon - a comprehensive long-term energy plan that reduces our dependence on foreign oil?" he said. "The people of America want an energy plan. John Cornyn wants partisan politics."

Mr. Cornyn said he's confident the drilling would be conducted in an "environmentally responsible manner."

He noted that 60 percent of U.S. oil comes from imports. Of that, 8.5 percent comes from Iraq through the oil-for-food program.

"If that supply were to be cut off at any given time, it would literally bring our economy to its knees and impair our national security in the process," he said.

The U.S. Geologic Survey estimates there to be 10.3 billion barrels of recoverable oil in the 1.5 million-acre coastal plain known by its acronym, ANWR. Polls show that roughly seven in 10 Alaskans favor drilling, and other studies show that drilling in Alaska would create up to 60,000 jobs for Texas companies that supply oilfield equipment and services.

Mr. Cornyn tweaked his opponent for calling the ANWR plan "goofy" last April, a few days after the Senate rejected it.

"You would think that anyone who wanted to represent the state of Texas would see the wisdom of this both in terms of our national security and in terms of job creation for the hard hats and the hard-working men and women of our state," he said.

Mr. Gibbs noted that 95 percent of Alaska's North Slope is already open to drilling. He added that Mr. Kirk supports building a pipeline to the lower 48 states that would make greater production economically feasible, create up to 400,000 jobs, and make available far more oil than ANWR could.

E-mail tgillman@dallasnews.com


Online at: http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dallas/tsw/stories/100502dntexsenate.c30dd.html


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: anwr; environmentalwhacko; johncornyn; ronkirk; texas; texassenaterace

The U.S. Geologic Survey estimates there to be 10.3 billion barrels of recoverable oil in the 1.5 million-acre coastal plain known by its acronym, ANWR. Polls show that roughly seven in 10 Alaskans favor drilling, and other studies show that drilling in Alaska would create up to 60,000 jobs for Texas companies that supply oilfield equipment and services.

Mr. Cornyn tweaked his opponent for calling the ANWR plan "goofy" last April, a few days after the Senate rejected it.

"You would think that anyone who wanted to represent the state of Texas would see the wisdom of this both in terms of our national security and in terms of job creation for the hard hats and the hard-working men and women of our state," he said.

Yet another Kirk stand against progress and with the environmental whackos and with the Senate Obstructors.....
Vote Cornyn !!


John Cornyn-R, left, and Ron Kirk-D

1 posted on 10/05/2002 3:42:19 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Squantos; GeronL; Billie; Slyfox; San Jacinto; SpookBrat; FITZ; COB1; DainBramage; Dallas; ...
Cornyn sees Texas jobs in Alaska refuge - Oil plan
also improves security; Kirk favors alternatives



Please let me know if you want ON or OFF my Texas ping list!. . .don't be shy.
No, you don't HAVE to be a Texan to get on this list!


2 posted on 10/05/2002 3:43:43 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
fyi........
3 posted on 10/05/2002 3:49:26 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
"He added that Mr. Kirk supports building a pipeline to the lower 48 states that would make greater production economically feasible, create up to 400,000 jobs, and make available far more oil than ANWR could."

Someone explain this to me please. Where is the oil going to come from? It sure isn't the North Slope (not 10B barrrels). Drilling technology has advanced greatly in the last 15 years. We can drill Alaska all day long and not impact the invironment in any significant way.
4 posted on 10/05/2002 3:52:02 AM PDT by Texas_Jarhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Indeed, Kirk is an anti-progress, reactionist liberal who fears modernization and mobilization of America's vital resources. He places fear mongering above jobs and prosperity. I wonder what he says about our surplus of forest fire feul?

BTW, did you know that something smelly is being uncovered about Kirk? Here's a fun look at the Kirk race in general and the Hicks Connection:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/763463/posts?page=4

Is this worthy of a general ping? If not, that is kool by me. FReegards....

5 posted on 10/05/2002 5:55:45 AM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Getting Tired of Others Carrying Your Water?

SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD




6 posted on 10/05/2002 6:01:12 AM PDT by William McKinley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
Bumping along
7 posted on 10/05/2002 8:06:20 AM PDT by deport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March
Is this worthy of a general ping? If not, that is kool by me. FReegards....

LOL! Yes, it is, and I did. Thanks.....

8 posted on 10/05/2002 10:21:14 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
I live in Alaska and I am for the drilling. The area they are talking about is so remote and somewhat barren. They do have ways of doing it where it causes no harm to the environment or to the wildlife. There is a caribou herd that likes to migrate through that area, but as with the pipeline and so forth they will soon learn to just go around it, and believe me up there is enough room for everyone, caribou and oil drillers! The local native population is for the drilling, and Alaska needs extra revenues as the state is having financial problems.

I'm no expert on the matter, but I believe the environmentalists do not fully understand the situation or the vastness of the barren land up there. And these days they do these things in a very clean way. BTW, polor bears spend a lot of time in the water and tend to hang on floating chunks of ice so as to spot potential meals better.

9 posted on 10/05/2002 9:31:16 PM PDT by DBtoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DBtoo
Thank you.

With the Enviro-Nazis it's not about the environment. It's about politics. If it was
about the environment, we wouldn't have all the forest fires out in the west today.

10 posted on 10/06/2002 6:50:04 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
The more Kirk opens his mouth the more I believe he is not playing with a full deck.

Where does he think 10B in oil is going to come from in the lower 48?

11 posted on 10/06/2002 7:43:07 AM PDT by RikaStrom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RikaStrom
The more Kirk opens his mouth the more I believe he is not playing with a full deck.

I don't think he is either......


I wanna be yore Sinator

12 posted on 10/06/2002 9:22:36 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson