To: Robert_Paulson2
To: The Great Satan
GWEN IFILL: If smallpox is such a dread disease, why not vaccinate people before they have a chance to... it seems almost backwards. Why wouldn't you vaccinate someone against the disease instead of after the disease has been discovered?
DR. JULIE GERBERDING: Well, the problem with this particular vaccine, the one we have right now, is that it has some real serious side effects. And there are some people who are at very high risk for the most serious problems including people with eczema or skin conditions, people have to immuno suppressive disorders and little children.
I didn't think the vaccine was that "dangerous" when I had it as a kid... is this a different vaccine for a different "strain" of militarized small pox, you think?
To: The Great Satan
Interesting article you posted about the anthrax vaccine too:
"So far, only one anthrax vaccine has been licensed by the federal government, and it requires six injections over 18 months. VaxGen's contract calls for an anthrax vaccine that requires no more than three injections. "
"Under the contract, VaxGen will adopt and push forward the development of a vaccine candidate that has been created by the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases. If results from the vaccine's first phase of trials are good, VaxGen will be eligible for an additional $13.6 million contract in 2003 for a second phase of trials. "
Do you think we can drag out taking action on Iraq, until then?
To: dd5339
vaccine ping!
66 posted on
10/06/2002 5:39:19 AM PDT by
Vic3O3
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson