Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Smallpox vaccinations urged (MSNBC) - Offer to general population represents a shift in policy
http://www.msnbc.com/news/817382.asp ^ | 10-5-02 | MSNBC

Posted on 10/05/2002 6:34:56 PM PDT by bonesmccoy

WASHINGTON, Oct. 5 — The Bush administration’s top bioterrorism advisers said yesterday they support a voluntary smallpox vaccination program that would begin with 500,000 health care workers, expand to 10 million emergency responders and extend to the rest of the population as early as 2004.

IT WAS THE first time high-ranking administration officials acknowledged they are considering offering the risky vaccine to the public prior to an attack and it represented a profound shift in thinking from the June recommendations of a government advisory panel to inoculate about 20,000 medical personnel.

“We live in a society that values individual choice,” said Julie L. Gerberding, director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. “If we have vaccine and we have data to accurately assess the safety, one school of thought is that informed people may want to have the choice of getting vaccine or not.”

In a 90-minute briefing at the Department of Health and Human Services, the group of officials responsible for implementing a bioterror response plan laid out the options before President Bush, stressing that he has yet to make a decision on who could be vaccinated and when. If a smallpox case were detected, officials would assume the nation was under attack and would quickly move to nationwide vaccination.

Developing a “pre-attack” vaccination policy, however, has proven to be “extremely difficult” because of the challenge in balancing the possible risks of the vaccine against the risks of an attack, said Jerome M. Hauer, assistant secretary for emergency health preparedness.

THREAT OVERCOMES CONCERNS

Although they have no way of knowing the likelihood of a smallpox attack, health experts fear such an attack because the virus is so contagious and so deadly. About one-third of people who get the disease die, yet the vaccine itself can cause serious, sometimes fatal, complications.

Concerns that Iraq or another hostile nation may have acquired the virus have added urgency to the vaccination debate. “We need to be mindful that the context of this decision has changed a bit” since the far more conservative June recommendations, Gerberding said.

Vice President Cheney has speculated that the threat from Iraqi President Saddam Hussein may necessitate mass vaccination. Privately, sources said Cheney has vigorously advocated a broad vaccination policy. White House spokesman Scott McClellan said last night the policy “is under review” but he could not elaborate on a timetable or factors involved in the decision.

Since last fall’s anthrax attacks, federal health officials have moved swiftly to build up the nation’s smallpox vaccine stockpile. If an attack occurred today, they said they could safely dilute the existing supply to inoculate every American. By the end of next year, they expect to have 209 million doses of new vaccine on hand. None of the vaccine has been licensed by the Food and Drug Administration, but officials expect the first batches will be approved by November.

MILITARY FIRST IN LINE

At the request of the Department of Defense, Hauer said HHS will provide the first 1 million doses of licensed smallpox vaccine to the military within the month. Pentagon spokesman James Turner refused to comment.

For civilians, the HHS team favors a policy of “ever-expanding access to vaccine” that could be phased in as more vaccine is licensed and scientists have time to monitor early reactions to it. Using licensed vaccine would be much easier logistically than administering it as an experimental treatment that involves tricky liability issues.

The approach envisions vaccinating the people considered to be at greatest risk if an outbreak occurs. That would include public health investigators, emergency room workers and even janitors and security guards at local hospitals.

The goal in the early stages, Gerberding said, “is to maximize our ability to respond to an attack should one occur.”

In the second phase, as many as 7.5 million medical workers would be offered vaccine, along with the nation’s 3 million firefighters, police officers and rescue workers, Hauer said. Inoculating that many emergency personnel “would make it even easier to respond” to an attack, Gerberding explained. It is possible Bush would combine the first two phases and opt to inoculate the majority of first responders immediately.

At some later date, perhaps in early 2004, vaccine could be offered to every American. “Right now, our thinking is in favor of making vaccine available to the general public,” Gerberding said.

Federal health officials rejected the advice of its advisory panel to designate certain smallpox hospitals because Hauer said it was unrealistic to think patients would follow those guidelines.

America stopped routine vaccination in 1972, which means about 45 percent of the population has never been inoculated. It is unclear how much immunity remains from vaccines given 30 or 40 years ago.

Between 30 million and 50 million Americans should not be given the vaccine because they have weak immune systems, said Anthony S. Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. That includes people who have received chemotherapy, have eczema or are infected with the AIDS virus. For every 1 million vaccinated, 15 people are likely to suffer life-threatening complications and one or two would die.

Because there is limited scientific data, it is difficult to predict the risks of a person spreading the virus in the vaccine to others. Administration aides are still grappling with the liability issues of reviving a vaccination program.

State health officials have until Dec. 1 to file plans for mass vaccination within five to 10 days of an attack, Hauer said. In the event of an attack, he observed, “Five days might be a luxury.”

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.com ...


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Announcements; Breaking News; Business/Economy; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bioterrorism; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last
To: stndngathwrthistry
I had NO arguement... I simply had questions as to the "small pox" assertion being the only motive behind the plans to vaccinate in a five day regimen being discussed...

So do others. THAT was the point of my question and the reason why I posted an article by reese that presented HIS questions about it as well.

I am looking for, and have gotten several epidemiological answers via email... WHICH WAS my point for asking... and it worked with some folks.

IT wasn't an invitation to do battle, over vaccinations... or a condemnation of the policy debate it relates to. I wanted to look at additional possibilities for the regimen.

OK with you?
21 posted on 10/05/2002 7:50:33 PM PDT by Robert_Paulson2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: bonesmccoy; Miss Marple
...they are considering offering the risky vaccine to the public prior to an attack...

We keep hearing about the risky vaccine.

The death rate from the vaccine is one to two people per million. The death rate from smallpox is 300 thousand people per million.

I know that my family is getting that risky vaccine the day it comes on the market!

22 posted on 10/05/2002 7:52:16 PM PDT by RottiBiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RottiBiz
I have been vaccinated 3 times. No one ever told my mother it was risky. I smell democrats whenever I see that word, don't you?

I detest the press.

23 posted on 10/05/2002 7:54:05 PM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
"a mutated variety of smallpox"

indeed...

and the folks who knee jerk here about a reese article miss the point... his were dishonest questions... but questions that NEED to be answered.

Presenting questions here these days, seems to bring on attacks, instead of substantive answers... with name calling and insults, instead of information.

Anytime I see an article that relates to a thread that has been posted, I don't really see a problem with introducing it... even if it is by dickh#$d morris, or james carville.

Thanks for the insight... we need to consider what we are facing might be WORSE than simple smallpox... I don't know how to discuss it any other way. Unless we were to start discussing what vaccines our family members in the military have gotten in the last xxxx weeks, months or days...

That's about as blunt as I can put it.
24 posted on 10/05/2002 7:57:11 PM PDT by Robert_Paulson2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
ebola and diseases that would require isolation of communities for up to 60 days, might merit MORE water storage, safe foods and a supply of cash and perhaps lead and brass items...

potential martial law... would be a necessary consideration.

just for starters.
25 posted on 10/05/2002 7:59:23 PM PDT by Robert_Paulson2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
The death rate from the vaccine is one to two people per million.

I wonder what the natural death rate is for a million folks, over a period of similar length... in car accidents and cancer alone... betcha its less dangerous risk wise, than a trip to the local grocery store....

26 posted on 10/05/2002 8:00:52 PM PDT by Robert_Paulson2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Cicero
CDC's organization in Atlanta has been favoring the "go slow" and "only we do the diagnosis" approach (which is a one way ticket to mass casulties if it were implemented). I'm full of respect for CDC, but the reality is that CDC is not on the front line of this biowar. The individual physician offices across the United States is the front line. Supplies need to be delivered to the troops in the trenches...that is the primary care office. Right now, the supplies (the vaccines) don't arrive at all. It's high time for CDC to wake up and smell the coffee. CDC needs to remove itself from being in the middle of our national vaccine shortages and return itself to the research and scientific program which made it stronger prior to the Clinton era.
27 posted on 10/05/2002 8:03:30 PM PDT by bonesmccoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
Yes, that's exactly what I was thinking; sort of like the "risky tax scheme" Gore kept blabbering about during the election.

Whenever I hear the word "risky" my hair stands on end!
28 posted on 10/05/2002 8:04:02 PM PDT by RottiBiz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Robert_Paulson2
any prophylactic antibiotic that is effective? Is it something a five day regimen of antibiotics would possibly prevent the spread of?

Are you talking about using an antiobiotic against ebola? Wouldn't work. Ebola is a virus, and antibiotics are completely ineffective against viruses.

29 posted on 10/05/2002 8:04:28 PM PDT by .38sw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: RottiBiz; Miss Marple; TomB
"risky" is a word that pops up during election years. Who was it that was using the term "risky" during the election of 2000? I seem to remember some SNL skits talking about risky schemes and Algore talking about "lock boxes".


"Lock Box" v. "Strategerie"

30 posted on 10/05/2002 8:12:43 PM PDT by bonesmccoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Robert_Paulson2
I wonder if this is about small pox, or OTHER attacks? Say what do they give you for radiation sickness? Iodine tabs? or injections? What about Anthrax, botulism, or ricin? plague?

What else makes sense?

For anthrax, post-attack treatment is the only viable option for the general public. Consider that, in the event of a major dispersal on the NYC subway, 4 million people would immediately be at risk of dying if they did not get treatment within 24 hours. Not a pretty picture is it?

The government just awarded a contract for a new "morning after" anthrax vaccine, which comes with an order for 25 million doses, enough to treat 8 million people. In the interim, the Pentagon's stocks have been diverted for civilian use, but the amount of vaccine is too small to handle even a single attack on the New York subway (say one sleeper agent tossing a few brown bags of the "Daschle" anthrax on the subway tracks round midnight). The are also big safety and efficacy questions surrounding the existing vaccine. The new vaccine should be through safety trials by the end of next year, if everything goes according to plan. The parallel effort to put in place a mass post-attack dissemination infrastructure, using the remote threat of a smalpox attack as a comfortingly hypothetical pretext, may mean that we have the civil defense framework in place about the same time frame. My guess is that any final showdown with Saddam will be delayed until about six months before the presidential election, based on these rate-limiting factors. There are plenty of things we can do, militarily and non-militarily, to keep the pressure up and kill the intervening time, before we push Saddam's back to the wall.

31 posted on 10/05/2002 8:14:34 PM PDT by The Great Satan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: .38sw
dittos to that... current medical therapy for hemorrhagic fever viruses is supportive...that's why the West Nile virus creates such havoc... there is no antiviral proven to shorten or lessen the symptoms of these infections.
32 posted on 10/05/2002 8:16:51 PM PDT by bonesmccoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: The Great Satan
THAT is the kind of information I was looking for... thanks buddy.
33 posted on 10/05/2002 8:17:02 PM PDT by Robert_Paulson2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Robert_Paulson2
IANAD, but I believe hemorrhagic fever is a term that encompasses several diseases that cause blood vessels to rupture. Ebola's been the most newsworthy of them because of the sporadic, highly lethal outbreaks in sub-saharan Africa every few years.
34 posted on 10/05/2002 8:25:54 PM PDT by Tree of Liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Robert_Paulson2
My pleasure. Here are some relevant links:

Pentagon Shifts Anthrax Vaccine to Civilian Uses

Production and Acquisition of Anthrax Vaccine [RFP announcement]

VaxGen wins federal contract to improve anthrax vaccine

Getting Ready (CDC's director's Freudian slip?)

35 posted on 10/05/2002 8:26:02 PM PDT by The Great Satan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: bonesmccoy
a voluntary smallpox vaccination program that would ... extend to the rest of the population as early as 2004.

That's WAY too late. If Saddam or any other terrorists have bugs, they'll unleash them on us long before then. This policy sounds like little more than window dressing to me.

36 posted on 10/05/2002 8:27:59 PM PDT by Skibane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Great Satan
GWEN IFILL: If smallpox is such a dread disease, why not vaccinate people before they have a chance to... it seems almost backwards. Why wouldn't you vaccinate someone against the disease instead of after the disease has been discovered?

DR. JULIE GERBERDING: Well, the problem with this particular vaccine, the one we have right now, is that it has some real serious side effects. And there are some people who are at very high risk for the most serious problems including people with eczema or skin conditions, people have to immuno suppressive disorders and little children.


I didn't think the vaccine was that "dangerous" when I had it as a kid... is this a different vaccine for a different "strain" of militarized small pox, you think?
37 posted on 10/05/2002 8:29:33 PM PDT by Robert_Paulson2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: The Great Satan
Interesting article you posted about the anthrax vaccine too:




"So far, only one anthrax vaccine has been licensed by the federal government, and it requires six injections over 18 months. VaxGen's contract calls for an anthrax vaccine that requires no more than three injections. "

"Under the contract, VaxGen will adopt and push forward the development of a vaccine candidate that has been created by the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases. If results from the vaccine's first phase of trials are good, VaxGen will be eligible for an additional $13.6 million contract in 2003 for a second phase of trials. "




Do you think we can drag out taking action on Iraq, until then?
38 posted on 10/05/2002 8:33:24 PM PDT by Robert_Paulson2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: The Great Satan; Mitchell; dogbyte12; Plummz; aristeides; Nita Nupress
I thought Cipro was the day after treatment of convenience. I thought it was plentiful, with side effects in more than a few per thousand.
39 posted on 10/05/2002 8:35:46 PM PDT by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Robert_Paulson2; Skibane
1. If they release Dryvax by Wyeth, then it is actually the identical virus and stock from 25 years ago.
2. If they release the new Acambis stuff that Tommy Thompson arranged, then it will be new and purer (WAY TO GO BUSH/THOMPSON!).
3. Secretary Thompson was interviewed by Rita Cosby last weekend on this subject. He stated that he was committed to getting this vaccine moving by the end of the year. If Sec. Thompson does this, it will be heroic (though the liberal media will try to trash talk Thompson as soon as the inevitable side-effects appear).

The most important factor is that the Free Republic readers should be calling their Congress critter and demanding updates on this issue. Furthermore, we need to be ready to defend the Administration when the liberal media starts claiming that the people don't know enough to handle this vaccine properly....they will argue that the gov't needs to control each dosage because only the gov't has people who are "experts".
40 posted on 10/05/2002 8:35:47 PM PDT by bonesmccoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson