Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CA: Accusations against Davis resurface
Sac Bee ^ | 10/08/02 | Sam Stanton and Denny Walsh

Posted on 10/08/2002 8:48:53 AM PDT by NormsRevenge

Edited on 04/12/2004 5:45:23 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: NormsRevenge
My understanding of the words "Promptly and forthwith" must be a little different than the court's.

I'm waiting....

21 posted on 10/10/2002 9:50:19 AM PDT by Tony in Hawaii
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: byteback
ROTFLOL, byteback--I was thinking the same thing. Davis is kicked off the ballot by the party bosses, and Jerry Brown or (smirk) Willie Brown suddenly become the contending replacements.
22 posted on 10/10/2002 9:52:54 AM PDT by RooRoobird14
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Looks like SCOTUS did something I've never seen before: it let someone file an anonymous cert. petition with an anonymous lawyer. Such solicitude for the privacy rights of crooks . . .

UNIDENTIFIED PRIVATE CITIZEN v. McCLATCHY NEWSPAPERS, ET AL.

02-111

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

2002 U.S. LEXIS 7388

October 7, 2002, Decided

PRIOR HISTORY:
McClatchy Newspapers, Inc. v. United States Dist. Court (In re McClatchy Newspapers Inc.), 288 F.3d 369; 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 29352; 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Service 3296.

JUDGES:
[*1] Rehnquist, Stevens, O'Connor, Scalia, Kennedy, Souter, Thomas, Ginsburg, Breyer.

OPINION:

The motion of petitioner to appear as "unidentified private citizen" and for counsel to appear as "Attorney Doe" is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
23 posted on 10/10/2002 10:19:27 AM PDT by Iconoclast2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Thanks for the heads up on this case.Here is the docket with some info. Let's dig , dig, dig, and DUMP , DUMP, DUMP DAVI$ !!!



No. 02-111 Status: DECIDED
Title: Unidentified Private Citizen, Petitioner
v.
McClatchy Newspapers, Inc., dba The Sacramento Bee, et al.
Docketed:           Lower Ct: United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
July 22, 2002 (01-70941; 01-10335)

~~Date~~~~~~    ~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Jul 16 2002 Petition for writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 21, 2002)
Jul 16 2002 Motion of petitioner to appear as "unidentified private citizen"
and for counsel to appear as "Attorney Doe" filed.
Aug 21 2002 Letter from the Solicitor General as a non-party received.
Aug 21 2002 Brief of respondent McClatchy Newspapers, Inc. in opposition filed.
Aug 22 2002 Opposition of Respondent to motion of petitioner filed.
Sep 4 2002 DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 30, 2002
Sep 5 2002 X Reply in support of motion of petitioner filed.
Oct 7 2002 Motion of petitioner to appear as "unidentified private citizen"
and for counsel to appear as "Attorney Doe" GRANTED.
Oct 7 2002 Petition DENIED.
********************************************************
 


~~Name~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~    ~~~~~~~Address~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~   ~~Phone~~~
Attorneys for Petitioner:
John K. (Attorney Doe) Vincent U.S. Attorney's Office 9165542700
501 "I" St., Suite 10-100
Sacramento, CA 95814
 
Attorneys for Respondent:
Charity Kenyon Riegels Campos & Kenyon 9167797100
2500 Ventura Oaks Way, #220
Sacramento, CA 95833-4222
 
Rex S. Heinke Akim Gump Strauss 3102291000
2029 Century Park East # 2400
Los Angeles, CA 90067
Party name: McClatchy Newspapers, Inc.
 
Solicitor General U.S. Department of Justice
Washington, DC 20530
 
Clyde Blackmon Blackmon & Snellings 9164410824
908 Ninth St., Suite 2250
Sacramento, CA 95814
 
Joseph Remcho Remcho Johansen & Purcell 5103466200
201 Dolores Avenue
San Leandro, CA 94577
 
 

24 posted on 10/10/2002 11:33:05 AM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
The 9th Circuit overturned Karlton in December 2001, ruling that there was "no adequate justification" for withholding the documents.

But the letters were not released because an unnamed "private citizen" appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court to keep the names from being revealed.


unnamed "private citizen" = Davi$ or agent acting for Davi$
25 posted on 10/10/2002 11:35:11 AM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Oct 7 2002 Petition DENIED.

Release the papers NOW, Guv! This is America, not Russia.
26 posted on 10/10/2002 11:36:44 AM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson