Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Microsoft Opens Passport to Scrutiny
PCWorld.com ^ | Thursday, October 10, 2002 | Susan Perschke

Posted on 10/11/2002 2:07:06 PM PDT by Bush2000

Microsoft Opens Passport to Scrutiny

Source code for server portion will be released, encouraging interoperability with other single-sign-on specs.

Susan Perschke, special to PCWorld.com
Thursday, October 10, 2002

DENVER -- Microsoft will release part of its Passport source code into the public domain so that developers can create their own versions of the single-sign-on specification for internal use or for resale.

The company announced the policy change at the Digital ID World Conference here this week, as part of a presentation by Craig Mundie, Microsoft's chief technical officer. Passport is Microsoft's user-identification system, deployed on a multitude of Microsoft platforms such as MSN and Hotmail.

The source-code release could come as soon as the end of November, Pete McKiernan, Microsoft product manager for the .Net platform, told PCWorld.com. It is the server-based Passport Manager portion of the technology, and it will be delivered in the form of a server code object, currently compatible with Windows 2000 server products. Mundie said the release lets licensees "extend, improve, and innovate" the Passport product under Microsoft's Shared Source License. Developers can view, change, and modify features as they wish, and they can copy the software without royalties or license fees.

Pushing Agenda

Microsoft's decision is not entirely altruistic; the company obviously hopes its action will spur adoption of its single-sign-on technology among corporate and commercial developers. Microsoft is also apparently warming to eventually enabling Passport to interoperate with a single-sign-on specification being developed by the Liberty Alliance, a consortium of 120 technology and services companies--many of them Microsoft rivals.

In addition Microsoft hopes that the source-code release will enhance the general acceptance of Passport as an industry standard for user identification and authentication, McKiernan added. Other code-sharing available through Microsoft's Shared Source program are Windows CE and pieces of Microsoft's .Net Framework.

Mundie characterized such standards as an "emerging layer" of technology that handles digital identification. Hardware-specific solutions may eventually be necessary to meet regulations for security and for confirming identities digitally, he said. Microsoft is taking that approach in its Palladium project, which ensures trusted communications by linking hardware and software security inside a Windows PC.

Mundie announced Microsoft's decision during a session entitled "How Digital Identity Helps Deliver Trustworthy Computing," which takes its name from Microsoft's recent secure-programming campaign. Passport's security and privacy provisions have drawn criticism from the Federal Trade Commission, which has accused Microsoft of misrepresenting the capabilities of the single-sign-on service.

Thursday's announcement follows on the heels of competitor Sun's recent release of an open-source software development tool that supports the Liberty Alliance standard.

Still Some Fees

However, not all aspects of Passport will be free of charge. Organizations using Passport for online commerce, for example, will still have to sign a contract and pay a fee for access to the service, which resides on Microsoft's own servers, said Adam Sohn, product manager for Microsoft's .Net platform group.

"For [developers] who want to build applications that plug into the Passport service, it just becomes easier for them to do that" with access to the source code, Sohn said.

The Passport Manager technology sits on the authentication system of a Web site or an application and communicates with Microsoft's Passport servers, where users are authorized and credentials are stored, Sohn said. Passport Manager is "really just the communications integration point," he said.

Microsoft earlier indicated it would incorporate more industry standards into Passport. The company has said it will support the standard authentication technology Kerberos to encourage compatibility among systems. It also has pledged to add support for Security Assertion Markup Language, which would also make compatibility more viable.

"Federation is an architectural challenge that we're still working on," Sohn said. He said Microsoft expects to fully integrate Kerberos into its products sometime in 2003, which will further its efforts.

In his presentation Mundie also said Microsoft is developing a Passport Password Quality Meter, designed to measure the level of security that a password might offer.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Technical
KEYWORDS: authentication; liberty; lowqualitycrap; microsoft; passport
Hmmmm ...
1 posted on 10/11/2002 2:07:06 PM PDT by Bush2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Dominic Harr
More cheese with your whine?
2 posted on 10/11/2002 2:14:37 PM PDT by Bush2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bush2000
Go Linux. Crush Microsoft.
3 posted on 10/11/2002 2:15:18 PM PDT by Notforprophet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bush2000
No doubt some folks 'round these parts will give the code close scrutiny along w/helpful suggestions as to improvement. Seeing as how some folks 'round these parts write perfect/bulletproof code. ;-)
4 posted on 10/11/2002 2:18:10 PM PDT by TomServo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TomServo
LOL. Yeah, right. Open mouth, insert broken glass, chew, swallow.
5 posted on 10/11/2002 2:20:06 PM PDT by Bush2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Bush2000
Microsoft = American Patriotism. Linux = Wacko Liberal UN Appeasement.
6 posted on 10/11/2002 2:24:05 PM PDT by Naspino
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Naspino
I agree that Linux smells like Socialism, but Microsoft's dominance over computer standards has hurt consumer freedom in choosing an Operating System.

Besides, Microsoft is the company that forces you to register its products and keeps track of your WinMedia usage, amongst other things.

Microsoft = Big Brother for the 21st century
7 posted on 10/11/2002 2:40:55 PM PDT by Galliard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Naspino; Bush2000
Microsoft = American Patriotism. Linux = Wacko Liberal UN Appeasement.

Hey, B2K, see why you find me frequenting tech threads less and less?

This says it all.

8 posted on 10/11/2002 2:42:19 PM PDT by rdb3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Bush2000
Yeah, right. Open mouth, insert broken glass, chew, swallow.

LOL!!!

9 posted on 10/11/2002 2:50:46 PM PDT by TomServo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rdb3
Hey, B2K, see why you find me frequenting tech threads less and less? This says it all.

Of all the people in these threads, your opinions are always among the most balanced. Don't go.
10 posted on 10/11/2002 2:53:24 PM PDT by Bush2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Galliard
Microsoft = Big Brother for the 21st century

If I had to choose between tyrants, I'd take MS anyday over Ellison, McNealy, or Case.
11 posted on 10/11/2002 2:54:44 PM PDT by Bush2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Bush2000
I'm not going anywhere, but I will admit that I'm just not as up to posting on tech threads as I used to be. I still read them.
12 posted on 10/11/2002 2:55:24 PM PDT by rdb3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Bush2000
Of all the people in these threads, your opinions are always among the most balanced.

Yes. I fit that description as well.

Cheers, CC ;-)

13 posted on 10/11/2002 2:56:30 PM PDT by CheneyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: CheneyChick
I agree (except when you post that pic of George W. Bush with an iMac computer) ;-)
14 posted on 10/11/2002 2:58:47 PM PDT by Bush2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Bush2000
You mean this one?


15 posted on 10/11/2002 3:00:42 PM PDT by CheneyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: CheneyChick
C'mon, own up. You have that one in your Favorites, right?
16 posted on 10/11/2002 3:03:05 PM PDT by Bush2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson