Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pak ex-nuclear scientist in contact with Al-Qaeda: U.S. expert
The Times of India ^ | 10-22-02

Posted on 10/23/2002 4:50:00 PM PDT by hope

WASHINGTON: There is some ground to suspect that former scientists of the Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission may have had talks with al-Qaeda at some stage. In fact, it is believed that two Pakistani N-scientists were in touch with the militant outfit.

This was stated by Robert Einhorn, Senior Advisor, Centre for Strategic and International Studies and former Assistant Secretary of State for Non-proliferation, during an interview on the subject of the alleged Pak-North Korean barter deal on the nuclear weapons front.

He added that, with a note of caution, that nuclear scientists always possess a lot of know-how which are of interest to "states of proliferation concern and to terrorist groups

According to Einhorn, "apparently there was some admission that these former Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission scientists had discussions with al-Qaeda. Now they claim to have been involved only in humanitarian kinds of projects. I don't know whether there was more to that or not, but I think it simply illustrates that Pakistan needs to have very tight control on its nuclear scientists, on its nuclear laboratories and even on former and retired nuclear scientists."

There have been media reports that Pakistan was a vital contributor to North Korea's secret nuclear weapons programme.

But Einhorn feels Washington possibly knows more about the secret pact than it is willing to let out, dependant as it is on Islamabad for war against terrorism and the rounding up of al-Qaeda elements.

The point is that the White House, which has cosied up to Pakistan since the September 11 (2001) terrorist attacks, has refused to discuss anything about Pakistan's role in North Korea's nuclear programme, Einhorn remarked. Hence the suspicion that it knows more than it wishes to divulge.

Early this year, President George Bush said North Korea was part of an "axis of evil" along with Iran and Iraq. But criticising Pakistan for its alleged role in helping the communist country create a nuclear programme might upset the partnership between Washington and Islamabad. The US is counting on Pakistani help to round up leftover elements of al-Qaeda who are believed to have fled across the border from Afghanistan.

Under the circumstances, America should insist that Pakistan keep a tighter lid on its nuclear knowhow, the expert said.

The New York Times</i> had reported over the weekend that some US officials believe that Pakistan and North Korea were engaged in a barter arrangement in the late 1990s, in which Pakistan supplied nuclear technology in exchange for ballistic missiles.

News of the clandestine programme has rocked Washington since the White House announced last week that Pyongyang had admitted to its existence.

Said Einhorn: "In the late nineties, here was a sensitive trade relationship between North Korea and Pakistan. North Korea was selling Pakistan No-Dong missiles. At that time, Pakistan was not in very good shape economically.

"And questions were raised - how is Pakistan paying for these No-Dong missiles. Well, speculation arose as to whether Pakistan had something North Korea might want, namely the technology to enrich uranium for nuclear weapons."

He further said that "Secretary of State Colin Pwell said he spoke to President Musharraf on Friday, and President Musharraf told him that there was no such cooperation between North Korea and Pakistan. The reporter asked Secretary Powell, 'Well, what about in the past - was there such cooperation in the past?' And Powell responded that he's not talking about the past, he's looking toward the future. Well, you could draw your own conclusions about what Secretary Powell may believe happened in the past."

Einhorn explained it this way. "I think it means that Pakistan needs to be encouraged very strongly and repeatedly to make sure it has the tightest controls on the export of sensitive materials, including nuclear materials, and very tight controls on nuclear scientists who possess a lot of know-how that could be of interest to states of proliferation concern as well as to terrorist groups."

"And so," he added, "Pakistan needs to make sure it has the strongest possible controls on the interactions of companies or nuclear scientists with foreign elements. This is critical, and presumably the US administration will be urging this of Pakistan.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: einhorn; northkorea; nukes; pakistan; roberteinhorn; wmd

1 posted on 10/23/2002 4:50:00 PM PDT by hope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: hope
Pak vs. India propaganda? (Though I don't doubt there are some ruffians in Pakistan)
2 posted on 10/23/2002 4:59:50 PM PDT by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hope
Pakistani scientists who collaborate with other countries' WMD programs should "mysteriously disappear" or have "accidents".
3 posted on 10/23/2002 5:04:34 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
Why do you say propaganda? What leads you to that?
4 posted on 10/23/2002 5:41:04 PM PDT by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy
Pakistan and India are ageold rivals. The source of the news is an Indian newspaper. I doubt they'd print many compliments about the Pakistanis.
5 posted on 10/23/2002 5:44:20 PM PDT by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
You should try think for yourself instead of in cliches.

By your 'logic' then any news item is tainted.

You should also try expanding your horizons and reading the wide range of opinions in the indian media.


6 posted on 10/23/2002 5:50:40 PM PDT by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy
Thanks for the (unsolicited, unneeded and unnecessary) advice. I'll give it all the attention it deserves. :)
7 posted on 10/24/2002 1:32:47 AM PDT by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
Well, judge the content of the article instead of a knee-jerk reaction llike you had.

And from your comments, you do need the advice.
8 posted on 10/24/2002 9:55:49 AM PDT by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy
I'll take note of it. oops, fell in the circular file. oh well.
9 posted on 10/24/2002 11:06:21 AM PDT by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative; Recovering_Democrat; hope
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A8422-2002Oct24.html
10 posted on 10/24/2002 8:41:00 PM PDT by Aaron_A
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Recovering_Democrat
Ignorance is bliss, aint it? Follow your bliss. Sweet dreams.
11 posted on 10/24/2002 9:51:14 PM PDT by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy
and good luck to you.
12 posted on 10/25/2002 12:44:59 AM PDT by Recovering_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson