WHY WE MUST VOTE REPUBLICAN

Fiedior Report On the News #293 ^ | 10-27-02 | Doug Fiedor

[forest]

There is a well entrenched organization afoot that is unabashedly reorganizing life in the United States as we know it. Fifty years ago, most members of Congress would have quickly labeled the goals and activities of groups like these "un-American activities." Today, almost all the members of the groups in question are members of both the Democratic Party and Congress, people with decidedly un-American intentions.

People none of us elected to anything would chair committees controlling our commercial law and much of the public lands and conservation in the continental United States -- even though they are not from here.

At least thirty important committees in the House will be chaired by card carrying, go to meetin' socialists if the Democrats win. They will have many of the financial committees, some of the military affairs committees and control most of the environmental issues. Their common bond is socialism, which they admit to publicly by membership in the Progressive Caucus.

The Democratic Leadership Council (DLC)"think tank" is the Progressive Policy Institute (PPI), which admits to being a "Third Way" socialist organization.

An offshoot of the DLC and PPI is The New Democrat Network (NDN) and acts as a political venture capital fund.

For un-American activities in the Senate, start with the impeachment fiasco. Not one Democratic Senator bothered to even look at the evidence against Clinton. Not even one! Which means, not one Democratic Senator belongs in any position of honor ever again.

But, at least Lautenberg is alive. In the last few elections the Democratic Party has actually thought it proper to run dead candidates.

Democrats on Capitol Hill tend to be out-and-out socialists and lawbreakers working against the original intent of the authors of our Constitution. Therefore, they consciously and intentionally violate their oath of office and should never be allowed to hold a position in any level of government.

As President Ronald Reagan wisely cautioned: "Freedom is a fragile thing and is never more than one generation away from extinction. It is not ours by inheritance; it must be fought for and defended constantly by each generation, for it comes only once to a people. Those who have known freedom, and then lost it, have never known it again."

[ffrancone]

IN 10 DAYS, THEY'LL BE VOTING DEMOCRAT

WHAT ARE YOU DOING TODAY TO HELP TAKE BACK THE SENATE?

TakeBackCongress.org

A resource for conservatives who want a Republican majority in the Senate

[BenLurkin]

My Libertarian FRiends and fellow independant voters: The democrat party must not be allowed to gain more power.

The democrat party is the focus of "evil" in the modern political scene. IT is far and away the most corrupt, IT makes election fraud a standard operating procedure, IT is determined to sell out our sovereignty to international governance, IT is dedicated to socialism as the guiding political philosophy.

You may not like the Republicans. I'm not that keen on them myself. But, the Democrat party is the unquestioned mortal enemy of America.

Please, VOTE STRAIGHT REPUBLICAN!

[forest]

For those of you not familiar with the alphabet soup political names, a glossary has been prepared for you at

<http://www.uhuh.com/defs.htm>

[phillyfanatic]

This is a tremendous help for all of us who are political junkies. I teach at a college and will use this as ammo. I am also a pastor. I will use this too , unafraid btw. This is why libertarians are wasting their votes. To get anything they really want , even in part, a vote for the GOP candidate is a necessity. Let the Greens destroy the Dems. But, the Libertarians should be coaxed not to destroy the Republic by allowing such people having the power to determine legislation that forrest has displayed in his research. If any GOPer, conservative, Christian voter stays at home on Nov. 5, they ought to be ashamed and deserve nothing but calumny to their lives! This election may tilt our republic to a socialistic future or one which at least has a chance to restore democratic-republican principles.

[tutstar]

bump

[forest]

So true. We no longer have the privilege of choosing the best. We must choose the least worst. Or as my kids would say, the leastest worstest. But at least there are some Constitutionally minded members of the Republican Party in Congress. Tough to find any in the Democratic Party.

[Reagan Man]

Well said.

The upcoming election is the most important election in at least a generation and for conservatives, may be the most important ever!

As Doug Fiedor has pointed out, if Democrats get control of the Senate and House, it will be a dark day for Republican's everywhere and America in general.

Conservatives have had three huge victories in the last 22 years. Reagan's landslides in 1980 and 1984, and Newt Gingrich's tremendous upset in the 1994 Congressional election. Conservatives even had a little luck come their way in 2000, with the "election" of GWBush to the Presidency. We can't allow this momentum to be halted.

Conservative Republican's, rank and file Republican's and Christian conservatives must unite this November 6th and assure President Bush has a Republican Congress to work with.

This is the challenge for all cosnervatives and Republicans. Let's not fail.

[tortoise]

This is why libertarians are wasting their votes. To get anything they really want , even in part, a vote for the GOP candidate is a necessity.

Wrong. That is an egregious piece of mis-reasoning. Voting for any candidate who doesn't pass the smell test only strengthens the opposition to those issues that are dearest to me. It doesn't matter what the letter is next to their name. The problem is that the parties have no clue what the people really want, and they try to give people what they THINK people want (e.g. Riordan in California). It is by ignoring the party on occasion or voting contrary to the losers that they occasionally toss us that they learn to back better candidates the next time around. Otherwise, you are just reinforcing their misconception that you liked the loser they handed you last time.

I generally vote Republican in the elections, but I WILL NOT vote for any nominal "Republican" who doesn't meet my standards. Period. By the same token, I occasionally will vote for a Democrat who for some reason is out of line with the rest of the party and actually supports the issues I hold dear to my heart. Some rural "Democrats" are more Republican than some urban "Republicans". If it quacks like a duck...

[RightOnTheLeftCoast]

Amen!

The Socialists have succeeded by a process of patient incrementalism over a century's time. It is foolish (and counterproductive) to presume that the clock can be turned-back in one election... or even one generation.

We must perform our own counter-incrementalism. That means electing folks like Bill Simon and Doug Forrester in the general election... and working in the primary seasons to gradually, steadily improve the field, ratcheting socialism back one notch at a time.

Want to see what the stakes are like? Click here for a fact-sheet on the California Governor's race. Sample factoid: In less than four years, government spending in California has ballooned more than 36%. This is unsustainable, to say the least... but socialists don't care about sustainability, they care about power. So print it out and distribute it to friends, schools, places of worship, businesses. It's critical that the socialists be defeated, and now is not the time to throw your vote away on a third-party candidate. You can make a difference for Liberty.

[Commie Basher]

We no longer have the privilege of choosing the best. We must choose the least worst.

That's long been the drumbeat of Demopublicans and Republicrats. Well, I've been voting mostly GOP for years, and things only got worse -- even when the GOP won.

Currently, the GOP is "least worst" on socialism. But the Dems are "least worst" on the current war hysteria. So they even out.

Come November, I'm voting straight Libertarian.

[forest]

Sound, well defined reply. Thank you.

[elbucko]

By instilling socialism in the United States, the Democrats intend to usurp our freedom.

The Democratic Party will eventually "nationalize" all major corporations in the US. If you think this means only Exxon and GM, think about Microsoft and Hewlett-Packard. Think about your 401K being run by an accountant appointed by a person of the likes of Al Gore. If you are one of those voters that think the government should do more for you, wait until the government begins to do things to you. Think about health care from the DMV.

Vote Democrat? Then cut off your hand, for it has offended thee.

[forest]

Why don't you just vote Democrat and save the trouble and hassle of adjustment? Same thing. You might look a bit deeper.

[BureaucratusMaximus]

That's long been the drumbeat of Demopublicans and Republicrats. Well, I've been voting mostly GOP for years, and things only got worse -- even when the GOP won.

Currently, the GOP is "least worst" on socialism. But the Dems are "least worst" on the current war hysteria. So they even out.

Come November, I'm voting straight Libertarian.

Locally I'll vote (LP)...nationally I'll vote (R) until the (LP) gets a base, gets the Harry Browne's out of the party, and their act together.

[concerned about politics]

Reject the 666. Vote 'No' to democrats in November.

[forest]

To Reply #10

That is an excellent brochure you hot linked on Simon and Davis. It tells it like it is with facts. I will definitely print it out and distribute it to everyone I know. You must have spent hours on it. Well done. Thanks for your help.

[concerned about politics]

Why don't you just vote Democrat and save the trouble and hassle of adjustment? Same thing.

Maybe they're secretly Democrat sympathizers. Who really knows what the agenda of the libertarian party is? It constantly tries to get Democrats in office but splitting the right wing vote. It often works. That's how we got Clinton, isn't it? Didn't they vote Perot?

[elbucko]

Why don't you just vote Democrat and save the trouble and hassle of adjustment?

I agree. Those who vote Libertarian, in a fit of pique at Republicans, are wasting ammunition.

I can't claim that the Republican party, right now, is anywhere near the principles of Goldwater and Reagan, but I do know the Democrats are much closer to Marx and Lenin than they have been since the Depression. The "Fellow Traveler's" grandsons have grown up in a society that does not recognize the collectivist. They are now high in the Democratic Party. The Dem Donkey has a hammer and sickle brand on its rump.

If you vote against Republicans and we can all call each other "Comrade". Soon.

[Roscoe]

Worse, Waxman** (D-CA) would probably take over the powerful House Government Reform Committee.

Scary thought.