Posted on 10/31/2002 3:03:59 PM PST by jstone78
Tiger "Hunting" in the USA
US Federal officials are investigating more than a dozen ranches in the USA where "hunters" shoot tigers, jaguars, leopards and mountain lions.
In some cases animals have been tranquillized and tied to trees and then shot, or released in areas the size of a football field to be killed by high-paying customers.
A report in San Jose Mercury News in California quoted Fish and Wildlife Service special agent Bill Talkin saying one tiger at a Monterey Ranch was shot dead in its cage when it refused to move out. Witnesses said another had walked less than 30 metres from its cage when it was shot.
One of the ranchers charged, Floyd Lester Patterson III, told the newspaper that the 38 criminal charges filed against him were "overblown".
"The way they're talking about like it was a crapshoot or something. It wasn't nothing like that. I'm a hunter and I lead guided hunts. There's nothing wrong with that."
Talkin said the federal authorities confiscated photos and videotapes of black jaguars, tigers, leopards and mountain lions being shot on the Patterson property. The hunters came from all over the USA.
David McMullen, also a Fish and Wildlife Service official, said that leopard, jaguar and mountain lion skins fetched about $5,000 on the black market, while a Bengal tiger skins could cost more than $10,000. Many of the skins come from old or sick animals that died in zoos.
The 5,000 acre Patterson Ranch is a working cattle ranch, but most of the stock were sold when feed became scarce during the California drought. The Pattersons also run a "California Ram Hunt" for legal hunting of exotic sheep, boars and deer on the ranch.
Genuine big game hunters of old, like former President Teddy Roosevelt, must be rolling over in their graves.
How about a compromise: if the tiger won't leave the cage, you can still kill it- as long as you get in the cage with it, and use a knife.
People (using the term loosely) like this do nothing but damage the image of legitiamte hunters and gun owners.
The same thing applies here. So what if someone isn't as good of a shot or as brave as others, does that mean he's not allowed to experience a hunt? If the animal isn't an endangered species, I say so what...kill the animal as you see fit.
Many people believe it's only ok to hunt to feed your family, others it's ok to hunt for trophies (but it must be a legit kill. And I guess to some killing them on a high-fenced controlled area is legit hunting to them. My point is there's a wide range of views on hunting. If you dismiss this type of hunt, you're one step away from dismissing your type of hunting.
Sniveling about this being a hunt is stupid. It is a kill. Call a Spade a Spade and move on. ----- Yea, I've got my ass-bestus suit on.
Nah. They understood that there were differences in the customs and methodologies of hunting in different regions, just as there had been considerable differences between the philosophies driving the Native American hunters and the White commercial hunters who nearly exterminated the buffalo- with whom those engaging in *canned hunts* would find very little pleasure, indeed, I suspect.
But much of the interest for the prepackaged *ranch hunts* comes from the end of the days of the great safari hunts in Africa and India. I enjoyed just a very small taste of that life while working on the African continent, just enough to realize what I'd missed. But of course after the human population is thinned by pestilence and war for another decade or two, that may be a pretty neat place to return to, once again. And Theodore Roosevelt [who detested the familiarism *Teddy*] certainly enjoyed himself there in his day.
-archy-/-
That can be done, though wild pig hunts in the brush are more fun and more equal- if you use the right knife. And a tiger is not necessarily as fearful under such circumstances as you might imagine, but you better not try that with a leopard or Cape Buffalo.
The Hawaiians, btw, figure a cane spear is a better tool for brush pig than a knife. They have a point, but either will make one squeal exactly like a stuck pig.
I feel the same for scuba divers and snorklers. I just got back from the bahamas and was shocked that loads of people would go out on a boat to a reef that the resort had already scoped out to ensure the fish were active that day.
Back when I was a snorkler and scuba diver, I went to the coast and started swimming--miles sometimes until I saw at fish. That's the only approved way to snorkle. If only people did everything the hard way, things would be so much better and people would appreciate the hard lives that fish have. {/sarcasm}
Hungry people with money. Actually, it is not a question about eating the animal. It is an answer of who owns the animal. I suspect that primitive man favored Oryx over Tiger for the Thanks Giving cookout. By the way, did you ever try to eat a buzzard? --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.