Skip to comments.
Coleman, Mondale run neck-and-neck in race
Washington Times ^
| 11/03/02
| Donald Lambro
Posted on 11/02/2002 11:15:52 PM PST by kattracks
Edited on 07/12/2004 3:58:32 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
ST. PAUL, Minn.
(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...
TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Minnesota
KEYWORDS:
1
posted on
11/02/2002 11:15:52 PM PST
by
kattracks
To: All
I went to the Minneapolis paper (www.startribune.com) to find out more on the polling, didn't really clear it up, but I did see this headline that explains what Walter Mondale has been doing for the last 15 years:
Moorhead man has been hunting bigfoot for 16 years
MOORHEAD, MINN. -- If a bigfoot is living in the dense, wooded areas of Minnesota, this man has not found him.
... Continues...
2
posted on
11/02/2002 11:20:50 PM PST
by
Oak
To: kattracks
You know, Davis did the same thing out here in CA with his one debate. Right in the middle of a workday.
Hmmmmm
To: Brad's Gramma
I don't think Mondale can stay up late enough to debate after work.
4
posted on
11/02/2002 11:27:20 PM PST
by
Oak
To: Oak
Work?
He works?
Just kidding. I know what you mean.
To: Brad's Gramma
I still think Mondale was the guy hunting for BIGfoot in Minnesota for 16 years
http://www.startribune.com/stories/462/3404980.html
The end of the article says:
"I think one of the main reasons why science doesn't take this animal seriously is because we have labeled it a monster, and nobody is supposed to believe in monsters," he said. "If it had just been thought of as a new species of wildlife, there would have been scientists out there looking for it."
Now, he's definately a Democrat this guy, he basically says if the Gov't would have labeled it a new species - there would be BIGfoot. I mean somebody has to be paying these scientists and it's not anyone that has to make payroll - if you get my drift.
6
posted on
11/02/2002 11:37:49 PM PST
by
Oak
To: Oak
Having grown up in Wisconsin, and after reading that article......I am making NO COMMENT!!! :-)
8 years old and stunned. Good grief. And yes, I agree, Mondale's the dude.
To: Otta B Sleepin
If you're still online....
To: Brad's Gramma
Thanks, I thought I heard you say "EH" at the end of your sentences...
9
posted on
11/02/2002 11:52:49 PM PST
by
Oak
To: kattracks
"He's not trying to run out the clock or anything like that," he said slowly.
To: Brad's Gramma
...60-minute radio debate at 10 a.m. tomorrow before an audience, sponsored by National Public Radio...NPR the sponser? Why not make Carvile the sponser? I hate the way debates are managed. The perfect debate, IMHO, is where no annointed media person says a word. Each candidate gets 3 minutes. The last word gets maybe 1 and a half minutes. Coin toss to see who gets to choose to open or close. They can ask each other questions. Prior to the debate, they can ask media people what would be good questions. I wager that this kind of open debate would devastate the rats.
To: kattracks
...the two rivals will meet in a 60-minute radio debate at 10 a.m. tomorrow before an audience, sponsored by National Public Radio and Channel 11. TV stations that wish to broadcast it live or delayed may do so. It will be televised. No one will see it, but it will be on.It will be dissected by the local news and FNC. Wednesday we'll all be asking: "where's Waldo?"
12
posted on
11/03/2002 2:42:44 AM PST
by
Aeronaut
To: Brad's Gramma
Thanks for pinging me to this one. It's the best article I've read yet - the Washington Times comes through again!
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson