Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pryor immigrant worker
KAIT8 ^

Posted on 11/04/2002 12:04:41 PM PST by pulaskibush

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last
Questions, did Pryor hire an illegal alien to work for him (which is against the law). Regardless of legal status, did Pryor fail to pay social security and income tax (also against the law). Why are these questions not being answered clearly by those involved? Should Pryor be given any position of power?
1 posted on 11/04/2002 12:04:41 PM PST by pulaskibush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: pulaskibush
Paging Ms. Zoe Baird...Ms. Zoe Baird, please pick up the nearest white courtesy phone...
2 posted on 11/04/2002 12:08:21 PM PST by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pulaskibush
did Pryor hire an illegal alien to work for him (which is against the law)

``When Ortenzia came to us she provided documentation stating she was in the United States legally. She did light housework for us, as needed, for a few hours a week and only for a few months. We have never employed an illegal immigrant"

Did you miss that statement? Looks like the question was answered. I think the question does need to be asked however about the socialized security and the income tax. However I understand work under a certain amount of time a week, it is not required. At least that's how it used to be here in NC

3 posted on 11/04/2002 12:10:58 PM PST by billbears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
I've heard very little on this, how is it playing down there?? Has it turned out to be the bombshell to knockout the NM rat candidate down there?
4 posted on 11/04/2002 12:11:33 PM PST by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: pulaskibush; 1tin_soldier; a-whole-nother-box-of-pandoras; Ahban; Arkansawyer; Arkinsaw; ...
Tell everybody you know this story. In addition, if you communicate with democrats, tell them their candidate is going to jail. In addition, tell them that he is against gun control, the democratic economic plan, the democratic war plan, and will not stand up for abortion rights.

If they are a republican, independent, etc. tell them that Pryor is for gun control (show the CNN story), against superior military technology (Council for a livable world), and will not take a stand on the rights of the unborn.

5 posted on 11/04/2002 12:14:20 PM PST by pulaskibush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pulaskibush
When question Sunday by The Washington Times, the Pryor campaign would not answer as to whether Pryor paid either Social Security, or income taxes on Osorio's wages.
While I don't agree that you should pay taxes for duties like this, it is the law and the Attorney General of the state should be held to them. How you can refuse to answer questions like this I don't know.
6 posted on 11/04/2002 12:15:06 PM PST by lelio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pulaskibush
Pryor's campaign released a notarized affidavit that said that when she worked for Pryor she was a legal resident of the United States and provided documentation to the Pryor family that proved her legal status.

What a joke! To determine whether someone is a legal alien, you rely on an affidavit from the alien? I'm sure there are hundreds of millions of people around the world who would be delighted to sign such affidavits, if the US government were willing to rely on them!

Show us the immigration documents proving she was legal at the time. And not just legal to be in the country. Legal to work! Of course, if they had such documents, they would have released them.

7 posted on 11/04/2002 12:15:08 PM PST by governsleastgovernsbest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pulaskibush; Landru; sultan88; stand watie; PhiKapMom; dead; EdZep; heavyd; Cyber-Band; MurryMom
"Pryor, who is also the state's attorney general, issued a statement responding to an item on the Drudge Report Web site of Internet gossip columnist Matt Drudge. The item said Pryor's campaign ``has been hit with claims he employed an illegal immigrant,'' attributing the information to unnamed sources. The report said the woman ``claims she worked for Pryor as a housekeeper for a year and was paid $7 an hour."

Why hasn't said worker come forward previously?! Has she been physically-threatened by the Pryor Campaign, or perhaps RAPED by Bill Clinton...we must git to the bottom of this...Right, MM?!

Bill Clinton is a Rapist, Bill Clinton is a Traitor, Bill Clinton is a PudWhacker...MUD

8 posted on 11/04/2002 12:16:01 PM PST by Mudboy Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
To determine whether someone is a legal alien, you rely on an affidavit from the alien?
Yep, I wondered about that too. He's setting himself up for the eventual finding that she's an illegal but he couldn't of possibily known that.
9 posted on 11/04/2002 12:21:15 PM PST by lelio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RoseofTexas
GOP is running this in their ads already! They infer Pryor failed to pay Social Security in violation of the law, yet is the chief enforcement officer of the state!
10 posted on 11/04/2002 12:25:06 PM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: pulaskibush
did Pryor fail to pay social security and income tax (also against the law)

It could be against the law, but it really depends on the specifics of the employment.

If she was hired as a direct employee, then yes it is against the law. If she was contracted to do the work, then it would only be against the law if her earnings exceeded $600 and he failed to provide her with a 1099. There are other laws that could apply but those would be the main ones.

As a Republican, I hope that Hutchinson has more than this to help his campaign, it's really a molehill of an issue.

I have a neighborhood teen mow my lawn and shovel snow from my driveway for 10 dollars an hour. I hope that Pryor loses, but I hope that TH and his campaign can come up with some issues of substance to convince the voters otherwise he's in trouble.
11 posted on 11/04/2002 12:26:27 PM PST by HEY4QDEMS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HEY4QDEMS
From Drudge:

PRYOR CONTINUES TO EVADE TAX QUESTIONS

Mon Nov 04 2002 15:28:32 ET

The Republican Party of Arkansas On Monday launched an ad calling on Mark Pryor to account for his silence on the issue of his domestic help and whether or not he paid employment taxes. The ad:

Title: "Evade"

30-second TV spot

Script: He's the top law enforcement officer in Arkansas. It's his job to uphold the law. But now, Attorney General Mark Pryor is avoiding questions...

Questions that he allegedly paid an employee in cash, to evade the law requiring that he pay social security and income taxes.

Questions that Pryor avoided taxes... the rest of us have to pay.

If Mark Pryor doesn't obey the law in his own home, how can he enforce the law as Attorney General?


Little Rock -- On Sunday, November 3, 2002, it was reported that a woman worked for Attorney General Mark Pryor as a housekeeper in his home for approximately one year and was paid in cash for her services. This woman told several members of the media that Attorney General Pryor had paid her in cash at $7.00 - $10.00 an hour. She reportedly told Fox News that she never paid taxes on the income paid by Mark Pryor.

The revelation followed an anonymous phone call by an individual who provided very specific details, which were revealed to the press by party officials. The details included names, addresses, phone numbers and other highly detailed information.

Republican Party of Arkansas Chairman Marty Ryall said, "The issue of whether this woman is an illegal alien is still in question. But more importantly, Mark Pryor's statement last night raises more questions than it provides answers. The fact that this woman was paid in cash raises serious questions about whether Pryor paid the legally required taxes, including payroll and social security taxes, on his employee."

Based on the dismissive tone of Mark Pryor's statement last night, does he really understand why his noncompliance with federal and state tax law is relevant? As Arkansas' chief law enforcement officer, Mark Pryor should be held to the very highest legal and ethical standard. Furthermore, Mark Pryor likes to talk a lot about the importance of saving social security, yet did he pay the required social security for his employee? Where is the documentation?

The IRS is very clear on when a person is required to file and pay taxes on a household employee. Under IRS Publication 926, a household employee includes those who baby-sit and do "light housework" part time.

Under the same IRS publication, if the employee makes more than $1,300 a year, then the employer must withhold Social Security, Medicare and Federal and State Income taxes. To reach the $1,300.00 threshold, she would only have to work 3 ½ hours a week at $7.00 per hour for the year. If Mark Pryor paid taxes on this woman, he should be able to quickly release the relevant paperwork. Pryor is required to file not only federal reports but also state reports with the Arkansas Department of Finance and Administration. Failure to file these returns may be illegal under Arkansas law.

Ryall continued, "We hope that Mark Pryor, as this State's chief law enforcement officer has followed his duties under current Federal and State law and hope that he can answer these questions and present the appropriate documents so as to finally put this issue to rest before voters go to the polls tomorrow."

This revelation raises more questions than answers:

ü Attorney General Mark Pryor is Arkansas's chief law enforcement officer, but did he obey the law?

ü Did he pay his housekeeper's income taxes?

ü Did he pay her social security taxes?

ü Did Mark Pryor fail to obey the same law that all other Arkansans have to obey?

Aside from the legalities (which ARE important), the democrat HYPOCRISY on this issue should be played up to the hilt.

12 posted on 11/04/2002 12:46:35 PM PST by MamaLucci
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Mudboy Slim
Bill Clinton is *not* a, "pudwhacker."
You're crude & disrespectful to X42, &, in the extreme, pal.
Straighten-up & fly right.

Besides, everyone knows.

...Bill Clinton's a, Bishop-Burper.

13 posted on 11/04/2002 1:00:32 PM PST by Landru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: wirestripper
Are his poll numbers going down because of this?? Heard Pryor had a great lead in the polls?
14 posted on 11/04/2002 1:01:32 PM PST by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RoseofTexas
Are his poll numbers going down because of this?? Heard Pryor had a great lead in the polls?

That is hard to say. We have a huge democrat machine here. I never trust the polling data due to fraud.

I would hope and pray for a upset victory!

15 posted on 11/04/2002 1:04:44 PM PST by Cold Heat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

To: Mudboy Slim
"BTW...Admin Moderator, would you please delete this post in five (5) minutes?!"

Why?
What is this, Mudboy Slim's version of, "Mission Impossible."?
We all know damned well what that creep was & in order to seriously describe the cretin?
It'd actually take a string of expletives.

Besides, we're all adults here.

...well, most of us.

17 posted on 11/04/2002 1:10:35 PM PST by Landru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Mudboy Slim
"Legend of the Purple-Headed Warrior, my FRiend!?!"

*Purple-Headed Warrior*??
~eh??

One-Eyed One-Toed Flying Purple People Eaters -- yea.
Heard of those.
*Not* the other kind, though.

BTW, stop flagging Robinson's imps, will ya.

...for chrissakes leave sleeping dogs lie.

18 posted on 11/04/2002 1:16:36 PM PST by Landru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: billbears
I won't believe Pryor's statements or her "affidavit". I will only believe she is legal when I see her proof of legalization.

And of course, this won't answer the question of tax evasion.

19 posted on 11/04/2002 1:20:38 PM PST by pulaskibush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Landru
"It'd actually take a string of expletives."

I just don't like to cuss on-line, my FRiend...and "Purple-Headed Warrior" is FRatLanguage, IMHO...MUD

20 posted on 11/04/2002 1:21:47 PM PST by Mudboy Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson