Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Recovering_Democrat
He may not need to make recess appointments. Just heard from Ventura's appointee on Fox that he is a strict constructionist (but social liberal) Has no problem with Bush conservative appointees.
17 posted on 11/04/2002 2:54:57 PM PST by Dutchgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Dutchgirl
Just heard from Ventura's appointee on Fox that he is a strict constructionist (but social liberal) Has no problem with Bush conservative appointees.

Does that mean he would vote, in a special session after the election, to reorganize the Senate if that is what it would take to get the Bush nominees considered on the Senate floor? (Of course the mere threat might be enough to persuade Leahy to let those nominations go to the floor.)

23 posted on 11/04/2002 3:13:38 PM PST by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: Dutchgirl
Just heard from Ventura's appointee on Fox that he is a strict constructionist (but social liberal) Has no problem with Bush conservative appointees.

The key question is how will he vote on organizational matters. If control is stripped from Little Tommy, then the judicial appoints will come to a vote, and most will be approved. With the appointment the Senate is split 49/49/02. With one of the 2 independants being the Judas from Vermont, the other this Independent Party guy just appointed. If the new guy goes with the Republicans, then it's back to a tie, with Dick Cheney holding the tie breaking vote.

25 posted on 11/04/2002 3:19:53 PM PST by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson