Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ed_NYC
I'm skeptical about this. Tubal ligations work wonders for most women.
2 posted on 11/04/2002 3:32:50 PM PST by hsmomx3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: hsmomx3
General anesthesia is always dangerous. Anything that averts the need for it will save lives. Every year, a lot of people die from anesthesia complications during minor surgery such as wisdom tooth extraction, D&Cs, etc.
5 posted on 11/04/2002 3:37:49 PM PST by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: hsmomx3
It's a long recouperation afterward. If you have children at home, you may not be able to do that.
19 posted on 11/04/2002 4:34:24 PM PST by luckystarmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: hsmomx3
This sounds much more complicated and invasive than a tubal.
33 posted on 11/04/2002 4:58:48 PM PST by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: hsmomx3
Yeh, but... I know several women who became pregnant well after tubal ligations. Not that this method would necessarily have a higher success rate, but at someone's been researching alternatives.
50 posted on 11/04/2002 5:41:54 PM PST by Kay Ludlow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson