Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CAVUTO REPORTS THAT BUSH CONSIDERING SCRAPPING THE IRS CODE!!!
Fox News Channel | November 6, 2002 | n/a

Posted on 11/06/2002 1:39:57 PM PST by Tree of Liberty

Neil Cavuto just interviewed Mitchell E. Daniels, Jr., the director of the OMB, and Neil let it be known that he's hearing rumblings that Pres. Bush is considering a total re-write of the tax code and that SecTreas O'Neill is strongly pushing a national retail sales tax!


TOPICS: Breaking News; Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 16th; amendment; bigsavingsaccts; fatpaycheck; goodbyejune5th; holdyourankles; internal; irs; liberalsscreechin; national; nrst; pipedream; putneckonhrblock; retail; revenue; sales; service; sixteenth; slavery; socialengineering; tax; taxcode; taxreform
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 1,081-1,088 next last
To: Exit148
What do they care? Their gonna get their cut anyway aren't they? I mean the tax money will be obtained in a different manner, but be spent the same way (i'm hoping not - we need some change in that area too.).
241 posted on 11/06/2002 2:51:47 PM PST by HelgaHawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: DH
"Under the NRST EVERYONE PAYS THE TAX! When you buy something you pay a tax. It's fair because everyone, law abiding or not, criminal or tax cheat, prostitute or gambler all pay the same rate of tax every time they purchase ANYTHING!"

Unless they buy it on the black market. That's the only major problem I see with such a system: a black market would spring up immediately, and it would be very, very hard to defeat.

242 posted on 11/06/2002 2:51:55 PM PST by Irene Adler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: mikegi
No income testing. Just exclude basic food items and housing. We want the government out of our personal papers.
243 posted on 11/06/2002 2:52:00 PM PST by Jim Robinson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies]

To: agitator
Well, at least it gives you a choice. Right now we have no choice.
244 posted on 11/06/2002 2:52:39 PM PST by HelgaHawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Lizavetta
There is a huge difference between a "Tax Cut" and a "Tax Rate Reduction". Tax Cut has become the generic term for tax rate reductions by the left for obvious reasons and the conservatives have never countered with the real term, tax rate reduction.

Reagan did NOT cut taxes, he reduced rates and tax revenue increased. A tax "cut" would have reduced revenues.

And the RATs in congress during the 80's promised to reduce spending $2 for every new $1 in tax revenue. They spending reductions NEVER happened and that is why we had such huge deficits in the 80's.

245 posted on 11/06/2002 2:52:54 PM PST by Phantom Lord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Deuce
ping
246 posted on 11/06/2002 2:53:59 PM PST by agitator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies]

To: Tree of Liberty
If this can get any traction, outstanding.
247 posted on 11/06/2002 2:55:09 PM PST by steveegg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: palmer
As one example, think about the difficulties of collecting sales tax on illegal drugs

Not many drug dealers are currently paying income taxes, so that's a wash.

248 posted on 11/06/2002 2:55:40 PM PST by ThinkDifferent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
I have argued for a Nation Sales Tax on a Yahoo site years ago, and I am for it, except that I think it only needs to be about 5% instead of 23%.

Keep in mind that if people consume with the Income taxes they would have paid to the government we don't need to do an apples to apples comparison in percentages.

The extra money (due to geometric increases in consumer spending) will flow into the economy and the Government income (from the sales tax) will go up and up and up.

Cancel the Tax code and then we can Argue over the percentages, but 5% is enough, and let the Economy RIP!

Bush gets this through, he'll be put on Mount Rushmore, or have a whole Mountain carved in his Image, LOL!

249 posted on 11/06/2002 2:56:30 PM PST by agincourt1415
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: BaghdadBarney
Repealing the 16th Amendment will take forever and a day.

I disagree. The 21st Amendment (repealing Prohibition) sailed through Congress and was ratified by the states in less than a year. The IRS is even more unpopular with the people than prohibition was.

250 posted on 11/06/2002 2:57:16 PM PST by Ditto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: Gorest Gump
"If Bush got this done, he would go on Mount Rushmore."

All those guys were home educated...we'll have to start carving another mountain.
251 posted on 11/06/2002 2:57:18 PM PST by Domestic Church
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: imperium in imperio
Actually, I think that I was wrong. I thought that the income tax was not constitutional when it was first introduced, but maybe not.

I don't have any idea why the NRST would be unconstitutional.
252 posted on 11/06/2002 2:57:31 PM PST by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
Why is everyone so hung up on keeping their mortgage deduction? If at the end of the day you keep MORE of your hard earned money under a new tax code without it, why would you want to hang onto it and have LESS of your money at the end of the day?

And 401(k)s do not escape taxation. You contribute pre tax dollars, but are wacked at the time of withdrawl and if you withdraw early you really get creamed.

253 posted on 11/06/2002 2:57:36 PM PST by Phantom Lord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: ThinkDifferent
I read the FAQ. They don't explain how this stops registration of all ammunition sales. Also no hint of the number of JBT's looking for "new" merchandise at my flea market.
254 posted on 11/06/2002 2:58:03 PM PST by palmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies]

To: Tree of Liberty
SecTreas O'Neill is strongly pushing a national retail sales tax!

Har! Interesting to note that O'Neill is listening to me!

255 posted on 11/06/2002 2:58:05 PM PST by Jackie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
And a flat tax would get rid of the personal exemptions. When you have exemptions, you do not have a flat tax, and you leave the door open to more and more monkey wrenching by congress to provide benefits to special interest that and special interest this depending on who is donating big that day.

I like Forbes plan. NO TAX on the 1st $35,000 of income and a flat % for every dollar there after with NO deductions.

256 posted on 11/06/2002 2:59:08 PM PST by Phantom Lord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Bigun; Taxman
PING!

That's a pretty big trial balloon, huh?

257 posted on 11/06/2002 2:59:14 PM PST by Eagle9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lelio
... sales taxes are actually harder on the poor as they have to spend a much hirer percent of their income than a richer person does that can save money.

The poor spend a much higher percent of their income (as opposed to the rich) on everything they buy, with or without a sales tax. That is one of the factors associated with being poor.

258 posted on 11/06/2002 2:59:33 PM PST by PhilipFreneau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: Dems_R_Losers
The one downside is that eliminating the income tax will immediately devalue all residential real estate by about 20 percent.

I don't believe that for a second.....houses will still be worth todays market value PLUS sales tax, due to the fact that they will be purchased with NON TAXED dollars which will, be more than able to absorb the sales tax.

Under my vision the sales tax would be added to each monthly mortgage payment (divided out over the life of the loan)

259 posted on 11/06/2002 3:00:09 PM PST by is_is
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: OKSooner
I'd be thrilled if President Bush just reduced the tax rates to where they were after the 1986 Tax Reform Act. If he also ended the estate tax and double taxation of dividends, we would see wonderful economic growth.
260 posted on 11/06/2002 3:00:34 PM PST by WarrenC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 1,081-1,088 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson