Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

We Should Shun Assassinations
King Features Syndicate ^ | 11/11/02 | Charley Reese

Posted on 11/10/2002 10:10:59 PM PST by GalvestonBeachcomber

As you probably know, the CIA engineered the murder of a man and five companions in Yemen. A missile fired from one of our drones killed them.

If indeed they were al-Qaida operatives, I have no sympathy for them. They have chosen to wage a campaign against us, and they are now casualties of that war. At the same time, I don't approve of the method used.

The problem is that they are described as "suspected" al-Qaida. To execute suspects is to use the method of the death squad. It appeals to our childish sense of adventure, to our desire for quick and simple justice, but, unfortunately, it erodes the moral values of the United States.

When you give up the law and proper procedures, you give up everything. No doubt most of the suspected criminals in the United States who were lynched were guilty of the crimes they were "suspected" of having committed. That did not make lynching the right thing to do. Not only is there the constant possibility that an innocent person could be killed, but it destroys respect for the law, and respect for the law was what the American Revolution was all about.

All you have to do is read the Bill of Rights. What the Founding Fathers were determined to do was to protect citizens from the arbitrary exercise of government power. A death squad, an assassination and a lynching are arbitrary exercises of brute force — exactly what men like George Washington and Thomas Jefferson so vehemently opposed.

If these "suspected" al-Qaida people were in fact members of the terrorist organization, they could have been taken into custody, tried and then dealt with. That way, any doubts about their guilt are resolved, as far as it is possible for humans to resolve such doubts.

What Americans must realize is that if the government is allowed to murder suspects in Yemen, there is nothing to stop it from deciding to murder suspects in the United States — maybe even you or me. It is always a mistake to cheer on a lynch mob by deluding yourself that it will never come for you. George Washington warned us that government power is like fire — "a useful servant but a fearful master." The whole essence of the American experience has been the continuing struggle to limit the power of the government.

Sure, dictatorships are more "efficient." Republican government can be messy and inefficient. The rule of law can be inefficient. But where would you rather live — in America, with all its inefficiencies, or in Iraq, with its very efficient secret police? The streets of Baghdad are safer than the streets of Washington. That's true of every city in a totalitarian state. But the price of that security is loss of freedom and the constant fear of something far more dangerous than individual criminals — a criminal government.

We should not make the mistake of believing that we can have the protection of the rule of law for ourselves in this country but abandon it in dealing with foreigners in foreign countries. The behavior in foreign countries will corrupt our own officials at home. No drug is more powerful and addictive than power, especially the power to decide who lives and who dies.

We can win the war against terrorism by following our own rules. It is not necessary to adopt the methods of murderers to combat murder. By resorting to assassination, we will make people fear us, and what people fear they eventually grow to hate. You cannot win a war against terrorism by making the world hate us.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: assassinations
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 341-358 next last
If they knew the targeted person was in the vehicle, why could the vehicle not be stopped and the person or persons taken into custody? Charley makes good points here.
1 posted on 11/10/2002 10:10:59 PM PST by GalvestonBeachcomber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GalvestonBeachcomber
It's a lot harder to get actual troops to a vehicle, than to destroy it.

2 posted on 11/10/2002 10:15:35 PM PST by cryptical
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GalvestonBeachcomber
I rather like the idea of wasting anyone involved with terrorists types.
3 posted on 11/10/2002 10:15:35 PM PST by Michael Barnes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GalvestonBeachcomber
War....foreign shores....approval of the local government....bombs away.

Reese never makes a "good point".

4 posted on 11/10/2002 10:15:37 PM PST by Psycho_Bunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GalvestonBeachcomber
This is war. We don't arrest combatants; we drop bombs on them and kill them.
5 posted on 11/10/2002 10:16:08 PM PST by arielb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GalvestonBeachcomber
Since his "retirement" Reese has moved further and further into la-la land to the point where he is now completely unreadable.

Like Jimmy Breslin on the left, Reese has fallen victim to a severe case of senility.

6 posted on 11/10/2002 10:18:04 PM PST by beckett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GalvestonBeachcomber
BS whacking terrorist wherever they are is a good idea.
7 posted on 11/10/2002 10:19:40 PM PST by weikel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GalvestonBeachcomber
This article reminds me of two kids wanting to fight, but first, quite calmly, listing a series of rules they should follow during the fight. Perhaps the military has good reason for an assasination of this nature. Can't have the enemy running around fearful only of getting caught, better to have them fearful of being vaporized!
8 posted on 11/10/2002 10:21:36 PM PST by TheDon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arielb
Well put.
9 posted on 11/10/2002 10:22:05 PM PST by TheDon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GalvestonBeachcomber
Because it was in the middle of the desert in YEMEN, for cripes sake.

It's called a "WAR", it's in all the dictinaries, look it up.

10 posted on 11/10/2002 10:22:42 PM PST by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GalvestonBeachcomber
Does the war on terrorism ring a bell? How about a congressional resolution about 13.5 months ago. Do you know the difference between killing enemy soldiers and arresting a crime suspect.

These are rhetorical questions, but consideration of them will lead you out of your fog.

11 posted on 11/10/2002 10:23:52 PM PST by breakem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GalvestonBeachcomber
If they knew the targeted person was in the vehicle, why could the vehicle not be stopped and the person or persons taken into custody?

It could have been stopped. Men could have lost their lives while reading them their rights. We could have extradited and tried them here so that the ACLU and peaceniks could update their FREE MUMIA signs.

But all in all I'd say one in the tail pipe was a much more attractive solution.

12 posted on 11/10/2002 10:27:17 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GalvestonBeachcomber
sure we can win a war against those who hate us - if they hate us, kill them - those that are left will comprise a harmoneous amalgimation that will live in peace and harmony and the world will become a utopia
13 posted on 11/10/2002 10:27:27 PM PST by ThinkLikeWaterAndReeds
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GalvestonBeachcomber
I say more predators, more global positioning systems, more data bases listing the last known address of every Al-Qaida suspect AND their family, friends, pets and causal aquaintances. More 22 year old kids with pimples operating joysticks in Tampa while eating cheetos. Think we can't reach you Ahmed? Think again!!
14 posted on 11/10/2002 10:27:44 PM PST by McBuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GalvestonBeachcomber
At the same time, I don't approve of the method used.

When Charley gets his own country he can do things he approves of.

Until then, George Bush is the President, and if he wants to blow up people that are trying to kill my children, well, I DO approve.

So there.

15 posted on 11/10/2002 10:28:31 PM PST by IncPen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GalvestonBeachcomber
Note a VERY IMPORTANT POINT: The PRESS story states that the terrorits were "alledged". Convient huh? I seriously doubt a Preditor would be used to take out an "alleged" target. Suggest you folks look behind the reporting of this incident. I have a lot more faith in those calling these shots than the reporters or those who would analize these events. Charley's point is no point at all.
16 posted on 11/10/2002 10:31:30 PM PST by epsjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IncPen
if Gore was prez, no way would he have the guts to do stuff like this. Let's save American lives-not Al Qaeda
17 posted on 11/10/2002 10:32:29 PM PST by arielb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: GalvestonBeachcomber
If they knew the targeted person was in the vehicle, why could the vehicle not be stopped and the person or persons taken into custody?

This is war not a police action.

In any case, the Yemenis tried to arrest them months ago. They were ambushed and a number of troops were killed. I don't want to endanger one of our soldiers lives for the sake of our enemies' "rights".

18 posted on 11/10/2002 10:33:45 PM PST by Hugin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GalvestonBeachcomber



© 2002 by King Features Syndicate, Inc.




They should stick to cartoons.
19 posted on 11/10/2002 10:34:40 PM PST by WSGilcrest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GalvestonBeachcomber
The problem is that they are described as "suspected" al-Qaida.

Charlie Reese- described as a suspected "liberal" reporter.

20 posted on 11/10/2002 10:34:57 PM PST by Mark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 341-358 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson